Conservative Majority

WE HAVE MOVED!!!!!!!

2006-12-10T13:48:00.000-08:00

We have moved our blog to one single location at www.conservative-majority.com/blog. Check it out and book mark it as we are closing this site down!!!!

Check out our new site, www.conservative-majority.com.

Vote for me...Your Advocate of Socialism!!!...

2006-12-09T18:18:00.000-08:00

The United States of America is a country of great prosperity almost seemingly guaranteeing those who live here the promises of success. The United States offers better living conditions, better work opportunities which translates into better paying jobs compared to the rest of the world, and most importantly Freedom. How could we make this great country better? I call my fellow Americans to stand up for a great and noble cause, one that would benefit all from the U.S.-born citizen to the illegal aliens. After all we are all immigrants to the U.S. in one way, shape or fashion. You ask yourself what great and noble cause I am writing about? Why it is none other than Socialism [Someone sound the trumpets].

One of the main issues that I hear and read about in the News is the fact that our baby boomers are now getting up there in age. Inflating medical costs along with the harsh reality that social security is not going to be around forever is just waiting for a Socialism advocate to step up to the plate and hit one out of the park so to speak. Here I am America, hop on my shoulders and let me lead Americans to that new prosperity.

By executing Socialism we will no longer have to worry about our fellow citizens being unable to cover rising medical expenses as we would be able to have that special ‘community pot’ that anyone at anytime would be able to pull from. I don’t know about you but I would definitely be able to sleep at night knowing everyone in America, both legal and illegal, would be provided for from the medical standpoint.

We have all been there at some point in time, the ‘Pharmaceutical’ bill is due, little G-Rome (pronounced Jerome) is sick, or worse Christmas the Holiday Season is upon us and we cannot afford to cover the cost no matter whichever it might be. Enter into the equation of that ‘community pot’ I mentioned earlier and suddenly who cares if little Johnnie is sick during the Holiday Season while your pusher wants his money, just pull from the ‘community pot’ let whoever get what they need and we can all be happier and we will be better people simply because we are helping those who otherwise would be unable to help themselves.

Next, one of the other problems that plague our communities is the different class statuses that we have. Lower, Middle, Upper, poor, rich, filthy rich are terms that we use to depict those living in our neighborhoods, our counties, our states, our Nation. If we incorporate Socialism we can eliminate these negative words and replace them with new words such as: Equal, Equivalent, Same as, One and the same. You would have to be a dead stiff not to get that tingling sensation using those words, go ahead, re-read them and you cannot tell me the hairs on your arms do not stand up.

Under this robust concept of Socialism we would be teaching our great Nation that in order to succeed as a whole, we must do so together, and ultimately achieving equivalent status in our society with our citizens’ ideas being everyone is one and the same. Being honest our great nation is divided between the Left, the Right, Us, Them, White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Islamo-Fascists, etc. Who needs that? What are we teaching America’s youth by using these forms of profiling? We are teaching the future leaders that those who shop at Wal-Mart are worthless compared to those who shop at, say Publix. We can eliminate this and in doing so will only make ourselves, our neighbors, our friends, our Nation even stronger. We are a world power and for once we will be able to show the World how a true great Nation under God operates.

We would be able to bring peace here on U.S. soil, eliminating all the negativity such as racial & economic discrimination, competition, the simple fact that many Americans are unable to live the American dream and are unable to provide for their families and themselves.

The positives definitely outweigh the negatives especially when you consider the Equality that will be brought forth as everyone will be on the same playing field economically and America will be one and the same; also a bigger Government to govern we, the people, who are too stupid and need the Government to dictate our every move; and finally being able to allow those who lack the necessary skills the ability to have the Government be their bread winner, I mean is Uncle Sam really my Uncle? Nope, but under Socialism he would be mine, yours, everyone and I do not believe anyone would disagree with that.

I understand Socialism has proven to be unsuccessful in Europe, but guess what, we’re smarter than them Yore-A-Pee-ins’. Besides, as long as I’m taken care of why should I care whether it’s successful or not, all I want is my piece of the pie.

Note** This was written in complete satire and the views expressed are not necessarily the actual views of the writer.**

Bush's Policies once again save lives on American Soil...

2006-12-08T19:44:00.000-08:00

Well, well, well a Muslim convert who talked about the desire to wage jihad against civilians was charged Friday in a plot to blow up a shopping mall during the Christmas rush with hand grenades. The perpetrator is Derrick Shareef, 22, who is an American citizen from Rockford, Illinois.

Shareef met with an undercover agent to trade a set of stereo speakers for four hand grenades and a gun, but thank God that Bush’s War on Terror has saved innocent American lives here on the fruited plains of American soil.

This is the problem that we have is that the Islamo-Fascists are not only in Iraq but they are here among you, me, your family, my family. It is a shame but it is very true that the United States is becoming more and more unsafe as Muslim sleeper cells are building up throughout this great country.

Eventually these sleeper cells will wake and our lives as we know it will be forever changed. I have to say that I agree with President Bush that we must maintain our focus in Iraq. Yes I realize there is much blood shed occurring on a daily basis but America cannot back down. If we pull our troops out it will only allow the terrorists to become stronger, no longer forcing them to hide in the Middle East.

This will empower those who want to see an end to American civilization and we will then see acts of terrorism spread to the United States. Let’s face it, the Democrats are not nearly tough enough with National Defense as what they should be and this will allow the Islamo-Fascists to walk all over the U.S.

Take a few more Muslims (converted Americans or not) like Derrick Shareef and pretend for a minute their acts would be successful, the American society would be in disarray. Just think if the whacko would have been successful in fulfilling his plot all the fear and terror this would have struck into the hearts and minds of many Americans. People would be afraid to shop for the Christmas season and the Economy would once again slump as it did at the end of the Clinton Presidency.

Five years since 9/11 and we have not had an attack on American soil. This plot foiled is another positive for the Bush Administration and the War on Terror, yet we do not hear nor read about this in the news media. Simply because this would be acknowledging Bush’s policies do work. For the Bush Administration they are really battling two wars. The War in Iraq and the war at home, however, the war at home is with the Liberals who are trying to demonize the character of our President. If only these people spent as much energy towards terrorists as they do in attempting to ruin the man known as ‘Dubya’.

This is me, what are you?...

2006-12-05T19:26:00.000-08:00

Your Political Profile:

Overall: 90% Conservative, 10% Liberal

Social Issues: 75% Conservative, 25% Liberal

Personal Responsibility: 100% Conservative, 0% Liberal

Fiscal Issues: 100% Conservative, 0% Liberal

Ethics: 75% Conservative, 25% Liberal

Defense and Crime: 100% Conservative, 0% Liberal

How Liberal Or Conservative Are You?

You've been PUNK'D...

2006-12-05T17:59:00.000-08:00

Robert Gates who was chosen to take over for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld pulled a tactic out of the Democratic playbook today and surprise, surprise beat the Democrats at their own game. When questioned by Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) on whether or not the United States was winning in Iraq, Gates promptly replied with a “No sir.”

Now at first I was completely taken back by this until I continued to read the article and soon discovered that it was a great strategy used. Pondering what I am talking about? It is actually very simple, that being Democrats are notorious for telling the American people exactly what people want to hear, but then have no intentions of fulfilling those broken promises. A great example of this is with the past mid-term Election when we heard about impeaching Bush. How Rangel will eliminate the tax breaks put forth by Bush as he sees none of the policies implemented by Bush as being successful. Ah, yes and then there is the quick pullout of our boys in Iraq.

Let’s flash forward to the 5^th of December 2006: Pelosi and the Democrats now believe everyone can get along, Rangel is not so sure about reversing the tax breaks that has helped our economy, and now some Democrats think it would be unwise to pullout so quickly of Iraq.

Back to Gates, he answered the Senate Armed Services Committee exactly with the answer they were looking for. In all honesty the Democrats and Liberals are looking for someone who is going to undermine the President and any and all policies that he attempts to implement involving the War in Iraq. If Gates would have answered ‘Yes’ to the question probed by Levin this would have resulted in a different scenario for Gates as well as the Bush Administration.

The Democrats would be uneasy about the man taking the place of Rumsfeld, ‘an architect of the unpopular war’.

Many Democrats want a phased withdrawal of our troops in Iraq, possibly beginning in four to six months, but I find this ‘want’ as just that, something they want. Realistically we, just like Bill Clinton, cannot pullout prematurely.

Where Gates duped the Democrats was that he answered the question that the U.S. is not winning in Iraq, but later on it was mentioned he said that the U.S. was not losing in Iraq either.

Point of the story: The Democrats have been played at their own game.

Racial Profiling is merely Stereotyping brought forth by Liberals...

2006-12-03T08:49:00.000-08:00

Airport officials have announced that they’re considering setting aside private areas for prayer and meditation at the request of imams concerned of the removal of Muslim clerics from a U.S. Airways flight last week.

To be honest I have mixed emotions about this especially after the events of 9/11. In our society we have grown fearful of Muslims in the fact that Americans are afraid what happened on September 11^th, 2001 could happen again. The clerics said that when they pray, they do not want a problem but it is out of the norm when these ‘devout Muslims’ lay down their prayer rugs and kneel on the floors at airports.

I respect that because in all honesty not all Muslims are terrorists just like not all white folks are members of the Ku Klux Klan and not all black folks can rap. However, the stereotypes do exist and we, as people of the World, stereotype everyday. If we see a man who does not look the most masculine in the world, we automatically peg him as gay. If we see a group of black men, many people get nervous, and roll up the windows, lock the doors and we peg them as thugs. If people see a Hispanic person or group, thoughts of illegal immigrants come to mind. Not so is the case in every situation.

This form of stereotyping has been brought forth by Liberals. They are the ones who view people in groups and not as individuals. Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Rich, Poor, etc., yet these same people are the very ones speaking out in regards to ‘racial profiling’, however, racial profiling is nothing more than stereotypes that they (Liberals) have presented.

If a Christian would have confronted Airport officials, what are the chances something would have actually been done about the situation? I am a Christian and this society has taught me that I can pray at any time and at any place. I can pray at home, on my way to work (speaking to the Lord), at work, never once have I thought about asking for a meditation room because chances are I would be looked at funny and told to leave whoever alone. Yet these Muslims get that opportunity to be heard and I believe this is because Liberals respect every Religion except for Christianity.

I think it is great that airports in Nashville, Tennessee; Columbus, Ohio; and Fort Lauderdale, Fla., all advertise meditation rooms and all note they are nonsectarian. The next thing that I see is the Muslims making a push for their own individual prayer rooms and one must consider the Liberal concept, “What you do for one you must do for ALL”.

People speaking out about the Muslims and their ‘suspicious activity’ shows that many Americans have not forgotten the devastation that some in the Muslim religion put on the United States of America. I can honestly say that I too would have my doubts boarding an airplane with Muslims, wondering if this would be my last flight. Call me crazy, call me racist, but just remember the following saying, “Fool me once, shame on you; Fool me twice, shame on ME.”

Throwing money at the problem...

2006-11-29T16:48:00.000-08:00

U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon has announced the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) failed to explain the cancellation of housing funds for Hurricane Katrina victims. What does this mean? FEMA must keep making payments and must pay victims for two months of housing since the decision to stop the program.

After initially reading this my first thought that came to mind was who appointed Leon and to my surprise it was President Bush. Now, there are many people out there who say that the Government, the Bush Administration, etc. should have done more for these people but come on folks, how long are we honestly going to give these people a hand out?

It has been fifteen months since Hurricane Katrina devastated everyone in America. In some way, shape or form, many Americans were either directly or indirectly affected. For me, I was directly affected by Hurricane Katrina and was a Liaison for FEMA and the American Red Cross.

I saw first hand how this tragedy made needy people into some of the greediest people I have ever seen. There was an overwhelming response to the victims’ needs not only in my area but throughout America. Many of these so-called ‘Victims’ were suddenly living a life much better than what they had before.

Long story short, FEMA kicks everyone off the Hurricane Katrina Welfare system and then we have a U.S. District Judge bring them back. That is what is wrong with America, instead of forcing these people to better themselves, we are only throwing more money at the problem. These people will forever feel as if we owe them something, yes it was a tragedy, but it was time to move on months ago. We are not making these people any better or being able to contribute to society when we give them no incentives to better themselves.

I think we should change the National Emblem from the Bald Eagle to the Sow, because it seems like everyone wants to use the Government. Our new slogan, “Grab a tit, hold on and suck.”

Liberal Media proposes question...'Who Lost Iraq?'...(We lost?!?!).....

2006-11-28T18:46:00.000-08:00

I am completely amazed at those in our society who believe the Media is not full of biased opinions. Better yet, I find it hilarious how many bloggers tend to believe the notion that the Media is more Conservative based than Left-leaning. I can only scratch my head in amazement and truly ponder why God would make some people so damn stupid. Of course though, someone’s got to make Al Gore and John Kerry look smart, why not the Media?

So, I was flipping through the Leftist magazine, “U.S. News & World Report” tonight and found something that I was not aware of. The title was Who Lost Iraq? and to be honest I did not realize we had lost Iraq. When was this announced, or should we be expecting it with Democrats in control of the House and the Senate?

The question is whether or not Democrats will attempt to pull out our troops early, and for once I think we should look to Bill Clinton for guidance. Folks, premature pull-outs are never good, we need to stay the course and as Bill Clinton has done with Monica in the Oval Office, finish the job.

As stated in previous blogs, the Liberal Media, the Democrats, the Liberal Kooks are not worried about winning the War in Iraq, the War on Terrorism, but winning in the War on President George W. Bush. If these whacko kooks spent as much time and energy on Iraq and Terrorism as they spend on bringing down Bush, we would have one super strong nation that would take no shit from anyone. Not even the Muslims.

The article mentioned earlier is yet another attempt to paint a picture by the Media to continuously discredit the Bush Administration. They want people to believe we have lost in Iraq. They want people to believe it is George Bush’s fault. They want people to believe it is Dick Cheney’s fault, Donald Rumsfeld’s fault, Condi’s fault, etc.

They want to demoralize the Administration until everyone believes and stands behind the socialistic views being brought forth by the likes of the Democratic Party. Good intentions will not bring us Peace, but hostility as we will become like a stepchild to the rest of the World.

Get a Free Pass- Join the Hollywood Left...

2006-11-27T18:50:00.000-08:00

As I was watching T.V. tonight and seemingly becoming dumber with each minute that passed by, I saw a commercial that intrigued me. The commercial starred Ashley Judd and was an ‘Aids Awareness’ promotion speaking how every 15 seconds a person 15-24 years of age dies from an Aids related epidemic.

Every fifteen seconds? That means that someone just died and another one is on their way. These numbers seem a little inflated to me, I mean we are looking at over two million young folks dying per year. Two million doesn’t seem like a lot until you start adding two million here, two million there, then take into consideration that this pace will only pick up and one day we will all be affected by AIDS. Well, maybe not, but if we listen to the ever knowing Ashley Judd we would believe this, simply because she is an actress and she knows what you and I are not smart enough to know. To me, she’s almost like a female version of Michael J. Fox, well, minus the twitch.

Thinking about these numbers, I only wonder why I never hear people such as Ashley Judd or Selma Hayek speaking out against Abortion. Why do you think that is? I know, out of sight, out of mind, they want to have that feel good about themselves but still be able to have their fun without the responsibilities such as an unwanted pregnancy.

So they speak out about Aids, wanting you to give fifteen cents a day so at the end of the day they can still say they are good people because they care. Do they really care? Do I really need to answer that for you?

How about rooting for our side...??

2006-11-27T17:34:00.001-08:00

Liberal Media outlet NBC has began referring to the War in Iraq as a civil war and we are seeing the beginning stages of the Liberal Media’s attempt to bring down the Bush Administration. Unfortunately we have many Americans who view the news from these outlets as the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help them God. How could the American public be lied to by the likes of Matt Lauer? Could it be, nah, never?

Setting things straight, the War in Iraq has had a tremendous amount of blood shed as has the other major wars that the United States has been involved in. However, the Liberal Media wants to strike fear in the hearts and minds of Americans to sway the public opinion of our Iraqi policy. This is why I believe that we never hear of any positive events coming out of Iraq.

The Bush Administration is battling the Left’s propaganda attacks here at home, and these Liberal Kooks have one goal in mind. That being complete and total character annihilation of George Bush and the rest of his administration. We are battling more than just Terrorists; we are battling fellow Americans who are so caught up in us versus them, that the real threats (the Terrorists) are only becoming stronger. Terrorists are gaining momentum as our Country is becoming split more and more between the aisles.

Hopefully America wakes up and wakes up soon because if we keep heading in this same direction, America, Life, Freedom, as we know it will become nothing more but a distant memory.

Making it worth the trip...

2006-11-26T17:29:00.000-08:00

I have made it back from my trip and though it was a long drive, I was able to pass the time with my iPOD having the last week and a half of Rush Limbaugh's shows downloaded for my listening pleasures. Anyway, on my trip I stopped in the city where Rush was born and raised (Cape Girardeau, Missouri) and was ecstatic when I found the following painting on the Mississippi River Flood wall.

Everyone can breathe now, Dems are in control...

2006-11-25T18:28:00.000-08:00

I have spent the last couple of days in Missouri for the Holidays, which speaking of, Happy Holidays Conservative-Majority Readers! Anyway, as I just wrote about my trip to Missouri I have been hearing about how great the economy is doing as another Black Friday has come and gone with the Thanksgiving Holiday.

After hearing how consumer confidence is up and has been up for almost two months now, I have to think back to just a few weeks ago and question why we were not hearing of this robust economy just before the November mid-term elections. Two months ago puts us, the American society, back into September when President George W. Bush was accused by the Liberal Left of politicizing 9/11 and this would be the end of the Republican control in the House and the Senate.

The Liberal Left was right about one thing that being the Democrats would take back control that they have not had for twelve years dating back to 1994. One has to wonder if the reasons the Liberal Left accused the Republican Party of doctoring with the prices of gasoline had everything to do with the fact that they, the Liberal Left, knew the Economy was on the up and up and had to make false derogatory statements against the Bush Administration and the Republican Party to hide the truth of how good this American society was becoming. Giving credit to President Bush would be completely against any and all beliefs held by these kooks. How dare President Bush do something right and if he does, let’s ignore, ignore, ignore.

Next, it seems to me that every time I turn on the ‘Evening News’ we hear how this day, or that day has been the most deadly day in Iraq. How the Bush Administration took us to war under false pretense and now the end is not in sight.

Let’s be honest here, the original goal of going into Iraq was to take down an evil dictator and President Bush was successful. With memory serving me correctly, the Bush Administration had support from the very Liberal Left kooks who are now speaking out against him and the War in Iraq.

Folks, wake up call here, we have had success in taking down Saddam Hussein and for the quacks who say that President Bush celebrated prematurely with his ‘Mission Accomplished’ remember the Mission was accomplished. However, we will never hear of this because once again giving him the overdue kudos he deserves would be against any and all beliefs held by these idiots.

I know, I know, there is someone out there reading this chomping at the bit to say, “Hey, WMD, no WMD, Bush lied, People died…” With that, turn to the Democratic Party primarily the Clinton administration and do some general Yahoo! Searches and one would be amazed at how often Slick Willie’s staff spoke out about how dangerous Hussein was not only to his own people, not only to the United States, but also to the World.

President George W. Bush is not the problem the Liberal Left Kooks are the problem. America, a 12 step program is required and the first step is to admit you have a problem. Admitting this problem can be difficult and challenging as many in our society have become Liberal Puppets to the real problem, Democratic Party leaders.

Here comes Charlie, here comes Charlie, right down Liberal Lane...

2006-11-19T19:29:00.000-08:00

Charlie Rangel is back in the news after deciding that Americans should have to sign up for a new military draft after turning 18 under a bill that the kook liberal will introduce next year. Rangel said Sunday that he sees his idea as a way to deter politicians from launching wars.

Politicians from launching wars, let’s fix that statement for him. What he meant to say, but didn’t was this is a way to demean the reputation of President Bush. If we listened to every poll out there, to every liberal news report, and actually believed the bile we were told, there would be many Americans against the War on Terror, the War on Iraq, etc. Everyone would actually believe that what we are doing is not in the best interests of our Nation and to the world.

Being honest here, we cannot turn back for in all reality we will be admitting defeat and we will become more and more vulnerable to attacks. Hell, with Democrats in control of both the House and the Senate, it is merely a matter of time before we are attacked again, on our own soil. Then, just maybe then, the American society will wake up, realize and support this country’s military actions.

I’m leaving the rest of this up for debate, I look forward to everyone’s viewpoints, both Liberal, Conservative or whatever.

Poll Results...

2006-11-19T19:05:00.000-08:00

Will Democrats improve America's economy if they win the mid-term Elections?
Yes- (17%)
No- (83%)

Do not forget to vote in our New Poll!

Will Murtha blame it on Election fraud???...

2006-11-16T19:22:00.000-08:00

Big news came out of Washington today when the Democrats picked Rep. Steny Hoyer to be the next House Majority Leader over Rep. John Murtha with a vote of 149-86. Hoyer’s win came just a short time after Democrats made Pelosi the first woman to hold the coveted position of Speaker of the House. For those not knowing of this position, this means that Nancy Pelosi will now be third in line to the Presidency beginning in January when Congress reconvenes.

Pelosi told those in attendance the Democrats need to have unity within the party and then promptly nominated Murtha as the House Majority Leader. Examining this shows the Democrats have already shot down Pelosi’s first call to action as the next Speaker of the House. What kind of message will this send not only to Pelosi but throughout the rest of the Democratic Party?

If Murtha would have won the nomination, there is no doubt an Iraq pre-mature pullout would have been inevitable as he and Pelosi would have teamed together eradicating all the War Policies put forth by the Bush Administration. Devaluating the current White House Administration would not have stopped there though, next would have been other policies such as the Tax Breaks put in place by Bush which has greatly contributed to our society and our economy. Charlie Rangel would have seen his cue and entered into the Political Realm of tearing the Bush Administration apart, one policy after another. The new Democratic slogan would have been, “Eating the Elephant one bite at a time.”

Only time will tell whether the next two years will be successful for the Democratic Party or if they will fall flat on their ‘ass’ (pun intended). As mentioned in a previous post, I do not believe the Democrats truly expected to win based on their platform alone. They were successful in playing upon the thoughts and feelings of the American public and were able to sway the vote and the elections.

Just touching the surface briefly here, one has to wonder if Hillary Rodham-Clinton will delay her Presidential bid from 2008 to 2012. If the delay is pushed back another Presidential term it should be considered how strong Hillary believes her candidacy to be. Meaning if the Democrats get in and are unable to make significant changes to our society, I believe the Silent Majority will speak and speak loudly in the casting of votes come 2008. A Democratic failure would put extra pressure upon Clinton and would thus weaken her socialistic platform she would be campaigning on. The American people want change and demonstrated that strongly with the November Elections. The kind of change does not mean bringing on socialism.

Whacky Wednesday...

2006-11-15T18:59:00.000-08:00

So I have been sitting back the last couple of days just taking everything in and reflecting on everything that went wrong with the Republican Party and the November 7th Election.

To be honest I am still in shock that the American public was so ignorant to actually put the Democratic Party in control of both the House and the Senate. What is this great American society that we live in coming to? The next two years, as I've said before, will be the make or break for the Democrats/Liberals. If they are unable to be successful, it will be a quick two and out, however, if they are successful one has to wonder the approaches and Party Platforms they will be using.

It wasn't that long ago, back in the summer actually, that Nancy Pelosi was calling for the Impeachment of President George W. Bush and now she is talking about working things out between Democrats and the White House. It wasn't that long ago that Charlie Rangel was talking about eliminating the tax breaks that President Bush had put forth for our country. Now he is backing off such talks, pondering whether or not the reversal would be beneficial.

What this tells me is that the Democrats did not truly believe they would win come November and now are scared shitless that they actually need to deliver upon the platforms that won them control.

I must say though, I am glad we've got the 'right' group in control, you know the ones that are going to bring this Country peace and harmony because they can be Diplomatic to these savages. All I can say is,"Good luck Democrats, enjoy your two years and be prepared to get the Hell out!

The Coffee Shop Platform...Or How the Republicans cheated America...

2006-11-11T20:47:00.000-08:00

“The Republican Party owes the

United States

, nay the world a huge apology for the last 12 years they spent ruling congress…”

Former Republican Committeeman

For half of a century the Republican Party was forced to look into the “dance” like a small poverty ridden child stares at candy through a glass. Then came 1994 and in a world wind of turmoil the tides changed, the seas parted allowing the Republicans to control both houses in congress.

The dream of two GOP generations had been realized. Finally they could rewrite the mistakes left behind from five decades of liberal leadership. Finally, what ifs and if onlys were transformed into we wills.

So what happened? Let’s review.

After almost 50 years the Republicans at first seemed too timid to move. This allowed Democrats to continue acting as if they had the majority, and the GOP revolution’s progress slowed to a crawl.

The American public failed to take note and the 2000 election brought pandemonium with Republicans controlling Congress, and the White House. Oh yes, the dream could finally be realized.

And then they seemingly forgot…

They must have! How else can you explain a party allowing the scandals brought forth by their leadership? They forgot why they were sent to Washington. Don’t get me wrong, grassroots Republicans knew exactly what they wanted. However not every Republican in Washington got the memo.

Republicans were sent to D.C. in herds because the Democratic Party had lost touch with heart land. Common sense in our nation’s capitol was harder to find than beer at a Southern Baptist Convention. The nation’s problems had been solved years before in every coffee shop and around most kitchen tables in America, and for 50 years the Democratic Party had been listening to the message less and less.

America was convinced in 1994, and again in 2000 and 2004 that the Republicans heard their cries and understood. But, it seems we were mistaken. Sadly the simplest of truths, logic on the most basic level escaped our leadership. The situation was only worsened as the public slowly realized solutions to our Nation’s problems were closer to being solved at the local watering hole than in Washington. And thus,….

The Coffee Shop Platform or (What America wanted the Republicans to hear)

-Abortion, we don’t love it, but we can understand why it could be legal in three instances; rape, incest or the mother’s life is in danger.

-Taxes, we love the tax cuts. But, spending must also be cut.

-War, do not tread on us. God pity the man (nation) that takes an American’s life. We will send justice quickly, efficiently and without forethought. We don’t crave a fight, but if provoked we will win, and win quickly by any means necessary.

-Jobs, protect our jobs. Thank you, for the tax breaks, freeing up additional monies for investments has been wonderful. Now could you do something about the companies moving every manufacturing job in America to a third world nation?

-No child left behind, never going to happen. After all some people choose to ride the “short bus” through life and by doing so must pay the price of the ride.

-Ethics, we might forgive a misjudgment or two. But, if you knowingly allow criminal activity and thugs to exist within your mist, you have got to go.

And go they went.

If only the Washington D.C. Republicans had listened to the talk in America’s kitchens they would have known….

America has the might to crush a country such as Iraq in a matter of days, if not hours. We have spent millions in tax dollars creating weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and yet we are fighting a ground war losing a man on average every few hours. The Coffee Shop Platform’s approach is simple: Nuke Iraq. Remember, Daddy did not spank you every day. However, the memory or lesson learned when it did happen resonated for a lifetime. And the world today needs to see America spank somebody.

We want worthless government spending and redundant programs eliminated. For instance, America offers 13 years of free education, and thus an opportunity to improve your plight in life. If you choose to use those 13 years wisely, college lays beyond. If not, life on the government Doyle will not be guaranteed, and rarely present for those whom fail due to laziness.

Second chances exist; GED programs are free across this nation. Those programs include college scholarships for outstanding students or student loans deferring payments until after graduation.

With the Nation’s education and tax issues resolved we can quickly turn our attention to abortion. Our Catholic friends want it completely abolished. However, in the spirit of bipartisan politics we are willing to allow it to exist only in the previous mention cases; rape, incest or if the mother truly will not survive the pregnancy. Even then we will pray for those that become baby killers.

We believe in God! We might not wear our religion on our sleeves, and we do not live without sin, however, we know our belief in God is not something to be ashamed to proclaim.

We will not force you to live a Christian life, but we know your fate if you don’t. Turning away from God is a personal decision; much like turning away from education the results follow you forever. You can deny our beliefs, you can deny God. You cannot deny his judgment.

So, how did the Republicans cheat America?

They failed to act, and by not living up to their potential. They chose to trust polling data apposed to their moral compass. They knew “Right” from “Left,” sadly they failed to recognize “Right” from “Wrong!”

"It's the End of the World as we know it...(and al-Qaeda feels fine)..."

2006-11-11T09:10:00.000-08:00

Now with the Democrats having control of both the House and the Senate, one must wonder which direction this great country of ours’ is truly headed? It has been known for months now that the terrorist group al-Qaeda has been watching this election and hoping for a Democratic victory.

Al-Qaeda hope no more, Christmas has come early for not only the Democrats but yes, al-Qaeda as well. Let’s be honest here, President Bush’s days are numbered and it is going to be a very long final two years ending his Presidency. That is, if Democrats allow him to last that long.

Talk of impeaching Bush, raising taxes, pulling out of Iraq have been talking points of Democrats for sometime now and unfortunately these talking points will begin to turn into reality sooner rather than later. An attack on American soil will almost be imminent with the total control coming down to Democrats and their socialistic view points. I was wrong when I over-estimated the American population’s overall intelligence. I was wrong in thinking that the American population had learned of the failures of Jimmy Carter’s way of thinking, the fact that it takes Strength to have peace, not good intentions as suggested by the former President.

The Democrats know they can stop the terrorism with diplomacy and I have to call ‘BS’ and truthfully speaking, I hope they prove me wrong. The next two years will be huge for them, either they prove their call to actions can be successful or they fall flat on their face with their policy. With Democrats in control with their diplomatic view we could be the future citizens of the United States of ~~America~~ al-Qaeda.

“Our choices may display our opinion, but God help us if they also reflect our character…"

2006-11-09T19:12:00.000-08:00

November 7, 2006 the American public spoke, and the message was one of change. The result created a shift in power, movement to the left, a return to a Democratic controlled House of Representatives and the promise of Government involvement in every aspect of our lives. Seemingly gone is the American concept of “pulling yourself up by your bootstraps,” and in its place exists a mood that your plight in life is not your fault. We are no longer responsible for our own decisions, but hapless individuals completely existing at the mercy of those whom rule the world.

We no longer teach our children that hard work will help them succeed, or that team work means not always being the focal point. Instead we invent excuses, and empower failure by creating attention deficit disorders and class envy via an “us versus them” mentality.

Deflating even our greatest heroes by denying their accomplishments as little more than luck, we have come to assume the Greatest Generation enjoyed success simply due to the time period. We no longer recognize a generation that transformed a landscape dotted with farms into a Super Power, instead we see through class envy glasses a group of people that acquired wealth with a lucky draw and a good flop.

The American conscious is quick to forget the price paid for success. The lives lain down on a beach with no name, or the marble crosses marking foreign soil forever inhabited by a G.I. Joe. America seemingly has forgotten the immigrants that came to this country with just the cloths on their backs, who with hard work, and a dedication to family quickly pulled themselves up to the middle class and beyond.

Ironic the transformation of immigrants into solid citizen continues today, and yet a cycle of inherited ignorance and perceived poverty prevails across this nation. In a Nation built upon the contributions of immigrants strangely there exists a consciousness that life is not fair, and thus mired in the mud of life I sit destined to go no further.

How strange the energy wasted to establish a minimum wage, as apposed to road mapping a way up. How strange that not only has America forgotten the marble tomb stones, but that not every life sacrificed is due to war. Two generations ago it was a given that parents sacrificed so that their children would succeed. A life spent stooped in a factory enable little Johnny to go to college. Johnny’s generation could then reach for the moon and beyond.

Instead, we have created a generation, or generations that look to others for help before first making the attempt themselves. It is only shy of a miracle that American babies haven’t evolved into a species born arms first, hands out.

Sadly, America has forgotten.

Why can’t America remember that it is okay to hold a belief so dear to your heart that you will lay down your very life to defend its morality?

Why can’t America remember that before success often must come delayed gratification? Or that America was once guided with a moral compass destined for greatness.

Blurred memories are not limited by social status, political party or geographical location. Nor is the ignorance that has seemingly gripped America restricted by religious beliefs, education levels or employment status. The disease killing this great nation is a self inflicted wound festering with the pompous attitude of self entitlement.

The disconnect between what is right and what is easy is killing this nation. Partnered with desires and a total ability loss in determining the difference between what is “wanted” and what is needed.

America needs a leader. No, America needs a generation to lead the way. A generation that is willing to make the tough choices, to sacrifice glory for sustained promise.

America needs a population that is willing to vote their conscious, guided by a moral compass rooted in the belief that the sum of our parts is greater than the individual.

America needs to become a land where freedom’s ring does not represent the right to do whatever, but the duty to do what is right!!!!

How about them apples...??

2006-11-05T18:37:00.000-08:00

Public Hanging?

Halp us, Halp u!!!!....

2006-11-03T06:00:00.000-08:00

Sister site...

2006-11-02T11:50:00.000-08:00

We have obtained a sister site at Conservative Majority.

Check it out and comment there as well!!!!

If you're so smart, how come Bush outscored you??...

2006-10-31T20:19:00.000-08:00

John Kerry is back in the news with his most recent comment, “You know, education, if you make the most of it, you study hard, you do your homework and you make an effort to be smart, you can do well. If you don’t, you get stuck in Iraq.”

I am trying to understand this man, John Kerry, who was almost the President of the United States of America in 2004. First off, Kerry told a crowd of supporters that he would kick the Republican’s asses from one side of the Nation to the other, then he was telling the Liberal Media that everyone deserves a second chance, hmmm…that sounds like a Liberal slogan, “He only raped, beat and killed the woman, give him a second chance, we need more Public School teachers!”

He went from being cocky to being insecure to now attempting to gain support from the Bush haters. Will this work or simply backfire just like the 2004 Presidential Plan that we are still waiting on him to disclose to the public?

Now our men and women serving in the military joined by choice, maybe that’s why Kerry is so bent out of shape because he had no say in his military career, he was drafted. President Bush commented on Kerry’s comments with, “Our troops did not enlist because they did not study hard in school or do their homework.”

Looking at President Bush, he is the 1^st MBA President the U.S. has ever had, but listening to Liberals he is a plain ole idiot. Then we hear how he is the mastermind behind the “Right-wing Conspiracy” plan. How did he go from being an idiot to being smart enough to be a mastermind?

Liberals’ opinion of President Bush is much like the weather, both change on a daily basis and both tend to change more frequently depending upon the season. Democrats in November are exactly like the Weather, both get Cold and Frigid this time of year.

Kerry later on said that “I apologize to no one for my criticism of the President and of his broken policy.” This is coming from the very man who considers President Bush out of touch with the American Society? How does Kerry expect to gain support for himself and his “Cut and Run” policy?

To John Kerry he has become above our armed services especially in spewing out these outlandish insults, yet the repercussions of his words might not be felt now, but I am sure they will hit him full force about this time of the year in 2008.

2,800 Vs 4.6 Million...what's the big deal???...

2006-10-31T19:59:00.000-08:00

October was the fourth deadliest month of our war in Iraq with the total just over 100 soldiers dying. It comes to no surprise to this blogger that we are hearing this as the November mid-term Elections draw near. Think about the dramatics used with one sentence, “..fourth deadliest month of the war…” Think about it, just for a minute, now tell me this is not an attempt by the Liberal Media to sway voter opinion just ahead of the Polls opening on Tuesday.

We are just over the 2,800 death toll of American Soldiers for this war, but with the ‘Cut and Run’ media reports a person would think this was the largest number of American casualties in our Two hundred Thirty year history. Now let’s look at other statistics that the Liberals are not telling us about.

According to the FBI website, there were a total of 16,692 murdered or non-negligent manslaughter cases reported in 2005 in the U.S., this does not include violent crimes such as rapes or assault committed. Also MADD reported an average of 16,000 alcohol related deaths per year on their website, or better yet the fact 4.6 Million American babies have been aborted since the start of the war.

Nothing is more alarming than the above mentioned number in regards to abortions, but in all honesty what we face in this great Country has proven to be more dangerous compared to Iraq if we base this off of numbers. Liberals will use statistics but only when supporting their cause(s), unlike with Paul Harvey, we do not hear the rest of the story with Liberals.

We salute and give the up-most respect to those fallen soldiers who died defending our honor and freedom from thy enemies, if only Liberals could give that same respect back. It’s about time the Liberals start rooting for our side.

Poll Results...

2006-10-30T08:30:00.000-08:00

Who would you rather vote for?
Hillary Rodham-Clinton: 0%
Barack Obama: 100%

Do not Forget to Vote in the new Poll!!!!!!!

We Support Our Troops...

2006-10-30T07:42:00.000-08:00

www.letssaythanks.com

Three things on my mind...

2006-10-29T18:04:00.000-08:00

I only have a few topics on my mind tonight, obviously one is the upcoming Election, also Michael J. Fox admitting he was unfamiliar with Amendment 2 from the State of Missouri, while the other is why people feel it necessary for blog censorship especially when an individual or individuals disagree with what they (the blog poster) have written.

First, with just about nine days left until November 7^th, the Republicans and Democrats have turned to overdrive when it comes to campaigning efforts in an attempt to gain more votes for the upcoming Election. As has been the case for the last several months, U.S. withdrawal from Iraq, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld’s called resignation by Democrats and select Republicans, as well as a Republican conspiracy has been the hot topics in almost all Election discussions across the Country.

Let’s be honest, this is getting truly ugly the closer we get, and I cannot imagine what the 2008 Presidential Election campaigns will be like. Obviously I support the Republican Party whole heartedly and I am becoming more and more irritated with the smear tactics used by the Democrats to affect voter opinion as well as voter turnout. My dad gave me some useful advice one time saying, “If you ever want to know about your family history, just run for a political office.” How true is that? Last thing on this tonight is Democrats are talking about needing 15 seats to win control of the House and 6 seats to claim the Senate, could someone please explain to them that they need not assume they are going to maintain every other seat they currently occupy.

Second, the entire Michael J. Fox fiasco has taken a new turn, or would that be twitch? He participated in an interview with George Stephanopoulos and was quoted as saying,

“…You know, I campaigned for Claire McCaskill. And so I have to qualify it by saying I’m not qualified to speak on the page-to-page content of the initiative. Although, I am quite sure that I’ll agree with it in spirit, I don’t know, I – On full disclosure, I haven’t read it, and that’s why I didn’t put myself up for it distinctly.”

Exactly why did he lie then when he said that Senator Jim Talent did not support stem cell research? Remember, in Missouri stem cell research is legal and is studied at many state universities throughout the state. However, McCaskill viewed this as an opportunity to smear Talent at the expense of having someone that everyone knew as a famous actor. From Missourian’s reactions (from a previous trip), McCaskill’s ploy should be unsuccessful especially after word and proof surfaced she lied about a voting record which aired in a campaign ad directed to negatively impact Senator Jim Talent.

Third thing is just me thinking out loud in which I find it amazing that I have been silenced on a Liberal blog (www.internationalpoliticalwill.com) simply because I have posed questions to what he has written, however, my questions cannot be answered by the owner, Wil Morat, because he can only use Liberal sound byte talking points. If there are any liberals out here who can shed light on why this tactic is used, please let me know…I guess though I have grown accustomed to being able to back up EVERYTHING that I write. Ok, not everything but 99.8%.

The Liberals' Agenda...

2006-10-26T08:09:00.000-07:00

We have all read about it and most certainly have heard about it, but let’s take the time to really focus upon what the Liberals will do if they win come November 7th. Democrats will attempt to push an aggressive oversight agenda investigating the Bush administration from Hurricane Katrina to Homeland Security.

We can expect a leftist agenda of more spending, higher taxes and a possible attempt of impeaching President Bush. I have read how Democrats want to call for sweeping healthcare initiatives and withdrawal from Iraq. Liberal whacko Nancy Pelosi wants to increase the minimum wage, negotiate a lower price for Medicare prescription drugs, implement all the 9/11 commission recommendations, end tax breaks for oil companies, and increase funding for embryonic stem cell research. Once again the Left will be throwing money to unfixable programs. Heck, Charlie Rangel has already said he will raise taxes, but when questioned about these remarks, all he can do is refute them. That is what is ridiculous, they cannot even stand by what they have said simply because they do not want to come across too strong before the mid-term Election.

A glance at who will be in charge if Democrats actually prevail:

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (CA): Most likely to become the first female Speaker of the House.
Senator Barbara Boxer (CA): Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee: expected to push legislation drastically cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
Senator Patrick Leahy (VT): Chair of the Judiciary Committee: place him in charge of confirmation hearings if a Supreme Court vacancy occurs.
Senator Jay Rockefeller (WVA): Chair of the Intelligence Committee: expected to investigate how the Bush administration used intelligence pertaining to the weapons possessed by Iraq.
Ike Skelton (MO): Chair of the House Armed Services Committee: expected to call for oversight and investigations on Iraq reconstruction efforts.

Obviously this is brewing up to be the downfall for the Republican Party, if you believe everything you read or hear by the 'Drive-by' media, but the real question is whether or not the American public is dumb enough to listen to these Liberal whacko talking points. Twelve more days to go, I am sure it is only going to get more interesting.

No tolerance for abortions...

2006-10-26T06:23:00.000-07:00

This is a very interesting and rather intriguing story from Nicaragua concerning the issues of abortions. Makes you wonder what kook groups like the ACLU, Emily's List and Planned Parenthood have to say about this...

Rush Limbaugh- America's Real Anchorman...

2006-10-25T22:41:00.000-07:00

I have searched various blogs tonight as I listened to the rain and a very popular topic has been one of my favorite Americans Rush Limbaugh and his critique of the entire Michael J. Fox twitchity twitch fiasco for the Democratic Party.

I am tired of the name calling in regards to Rush, tired of hearing how horrible he is and how much of a drug addict he is. Folks, Limbaugh called a Spade a Spade and then the blogs I found wanted to accuse Limbaugh of the very tactics Liberals use in everyday life. Now you, the Conservative-Majority reader, are obviously smart enough to realize that Conservatives when dealt with debate like to rely upon facts and reasoning to strengthen their debate. Liberals like to use how they “feel” and what they “think”, yet Limbaugh and we, Conservatives, are being accused of relying upon the very tactics that are commonly used by the Liberals in our society. I mean look at the ‘Drive-by media’ and the reporting done in regards to the upcoming election which is less than two weeks away.

What we are hearing is an obviously blatant attempt to negatively affect the minds as well as the voter turnout of the Republican Party supporters. To see some of the kook-ism I am writing of, feel free to check out the following sites and voice your Conservative opinions…

Kook-ism # 1
Kook-ism # 2

Mikey likes it...He really likes it!!!!!...

2006-10-24T20:51:00.000-07:00

Question: When will the Liberal Left realize that embryonic stem cell research has never been successful? When will they realize we cannot simply throw money into this continual failure of a program, I mean so what they had Michael J. Fox speaking on behalf of five Democrats but anyone who has been around those suffering from Parkinson’s Disease realize that Fox was able to do something that my niece has never been able to do. What is that you ask? Maintain her focal point of the eyes while the rest of her body trembles. Obviously Michael J. Fox was doing what he does best, acting.

Poll Results...

2006-10-24T17:11:00.000-07:00

Question: When you first heard of the plane crash in New York City, did you immediately think it was terrorism?

Yes: 89%
No: 11%

Remember to vote in our New Poll!!!!!!!!!!

The Future of Tomorrow??...

2006-10-24T09:38:00.000-07:00

Click on Picture to Enlarge

Campaigning time...

2006-10-21T10:31:00.000-07:00

We have recently been contacted from several Republican candidates (from Alabama, Missouri, Tennessee, and Louisiana) about Conservative-Majority linking to their site. As we get the addresses in, we will be able to provide a sidebar link to their sites. Feel free to contact your representatives and get us their information for the upcoming Midterm Elections.

For those readers in Alabama, we would like to introduce you to Judge Kelli Wise, who is running for re-election of Criminal Appeals. Feel free to check out her site and we would like to thank Judge Wise for allowing us the opportunity to help her campaign via the Internet.

Hmmm....

2006-10-19T21:21:00.000-07:00

How will the Democrats turn this into a conspiracy?

In the beginning...Adam & Eve...NOT Adam & Steve...

2006-10-18T12:35:00.000-07:00

It has been announced that former Massachusetts Representative Gerry Studds’ partner, Dean Hara, will be ineligible to receive any portion of Studds’ estimated $114,337 annual pension. The two were “married” in 2004 in the state of Massachusetts, however, their marriage is not recognized by the Federal Government.

This has created an outcry by Gay and Lesbian groups claiming Studds’ spouse should be entitled to the same rights of other representatives’ spouses. This would be a great case except for the fact that the other representatives’ spouses are just that, legally their spouse. They have marriages that our recognized by the Federal Government and what Studds had was not recognized. End of story, there should be no debating this but I am sure the ACLU will step in and start suing. When it is all said and done with, this country will have gone farther to hell in a hand basket thanks in large part to the Liberal kooks in our society.

Story here

"In memory of the victims of September the 11th"...

2006-10-17T18:48:00.000-07:00

President Bush signed a law Tuesday authorizing military trials of terrorism suspects and the legislation eliminates some of the rights defendants are normally guaranteed under U.S. law, and it authorizes continued interrogations of terror suspects. If you read the article written by an AP writer (Nedra Pickler), the word 'harsh' is used just before 'interrogations' and I have to disagree with her sentence usage.

The interrogations help keep us safe and if you remember back in June the Supreme Court ruled that trying detainees in military tribunals violated U.S. and International law, so President Bush was able to get Congress to change the law and insisted the law authorize CIA agents the ability to “use tough” methods when interrogating suspected terrorists. Once again, if you would like to get a Liberal point of view, actually read the article, in which Pickler places snide comments throughout the article in a bad attempt to discredit Bush.

To make things even more pathetic other than Liberal AP writers is the fact the ACLU has been quoted as saying it was “one of the worst civil liberties measures ever enacted in American history”, and in case you did not know this, the ACLU actually represents many of the terrorists with provided lawyers. Need I remind the group the ‘A’ stands for American, yet they represent the treatment of individuals who would rather see Americans dead. As Alanis Morisette has said, “Kind of Ironic, don’t ya think?”

Fool me once, shame on you...Fool me twice, shame on me...

2006-10-15T18:25:00.000-07:00

John Kerry has announced that he deserves a second chance if he decides to take another crack at becoming President of the United States. Kerry wants to use a basic Democrat principle that being, “Americans give people a second chance. And if you learn something and prove what you’ve learned something, maybe even more so. Now, I don’t know what I’m going to do yet. We’ll make that decision down the road.”

First, that principle seems very familiar, oh yeah because that’s the philosophy Liberals like to use especially when dealing with people sentenced to prison for heinous crimes. If we give them a second chance we can change them, we can feel good about it and they will be a better citizen. Bull Shit.

Second, this is the same person who announced back in mid-September he would “kick their (Republicans) ass from one end of America to the other.” What happened to the cockiness this man possessed just a little over a month ago? I do believe he is starting to realize how unpopular he is and besides, will he ever share with us what his plan was for the Presidency in 2004?

Third thing about this article is the correlation between Ronald Reagan being unsuccessful for the GOP nomination twice and Kerry running again. Let Conservative-Majority make a major newsflash for Mr. Kerry- You’re no Ronald Reagan. Do not compare yourself to one of the greatest Presidents of the United States.

I see stupid people...they don't even know they're stupid...

2006-10-15T14:20:00.000-07:00

I turn on the TV and one question comes to mind- What is up with all these polls from CNN to MSNBC about how bad the Republican Party is going to get beat this November and then in 2008? CNN reported that “about half of Americans think Hastert should resign” and again with the Liberal Media I must call Bull Shit. The article painted a picture for the reader that over half of all Americans think that Hastert should resign. Over half, think about that one for a while and then notice they only polled a little over 1,000 people. I’m sorry no one contacted me, what about you?

Reading through the polls on CNN.com (released Monday, October 9, 2006 at 4pm), I see questions from George W. Bush’s handling as President to which party you would vote for as of today.

To keep this post short and sweet, I will not rant and rave about each and every poll question but one that stood out the most in my mind was a question that should completely discredit and debunk those individuals who were polled. Here is the question:

Next, we’d like to get your overall opinion of some people in the news. As I read each name, please say if you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of these people—or if you have never heard of them. (Rotated)

Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
Democratic House Leader Nancy Pelosi
Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid
Senate Republican Leader Bill Frist

36% of those polled had not heard of or had no opinion of Dennis Hastert and Bill Frist meaning that about 370 of those polled did not have a clue about those Republican members they were condemning. It gets better though in that Nancy Pelosi was at 40% of not being heard of or people having no opinion in regards to her. The winner of all of this is Harry Reid who tallied 49% with 36% of that coming from never heard of while 13% was of no opinion.

This proves the old statement true that Democratic candidates represent the stupid people in our society. To think that many of those polled will be voting this November and will be casting votes for people that they have not heard of nor have no opinion of. This is why I believe we (Republican Party) win come November.

Poll Results...

2006-10-15T09:56:00.000-07:00

Will the Foley incident affect the voting outcome in November?

Yep- them damn Republicans are immoral. (11.5%)
Nope- Another failed tactic by the Democratic Party. (85%)
I don't think I'll vote in the November Election. (3.5%)

Don't Forget to Vote in the new Poll!!!!!

Spade is a Spade...????

2006-10-15T09:46:00.001-07:00

Conservative-Majority would like to thank one of our readers, Angel, for bringing this story to our attention. This particular story focuses upon my former state (Missouri) and a Republican from the Southeast Missouri region.

The individual I am speaking of, House Speaker Rod Jetton, was on a statewide tour with Missouri Governor Matt Blunt and Senate President Pro Tem Michael Gibbons promoting Republican legislative measures as well as candidates for the upcoming November election. Jetton made a comment that sparked anger in the hearts and minds of many Democrats. Our sympathies go out to those offended, whah, whah, whah!

Jetton remarked that, “Democrats don’t have a problem during the day because they don’t have jobs…Republicans work. It’s a little harder for them.”

Now we watch the local Democrats jump on the smear tactic bandwagon and attempt to bring down Jetton for his comments. Jetton’s Democratic opponent in the 156^th District Missouri House race, Michael Winder, said, “The statement shows Jetton is out of touch with voters.” We were also blessed to hear from Democratic House leader Jeff Harris, “…shows the utter disdain high-ranking Republicans have for hard-working Missourians. Speaker Jetton obviously believes that people who don’t share his politics are of less value…To the contrary, most hard working Missourians do not have the luxury of taking off work to attend a political rally…”

I love how low the Democratic Party members are willing to go, not just at the National level that we hear about, but even at the local level that will never make big time news. From reading the other quotes from this story it is obvious that those offended are trying to turn this against Jetton and promote themselves as being for the little guy, the hard working individual that Jetton obviously opposes.

Question Mr. Winder- how can you claim to be for the little guy, the hard working individual yet you favor raising taxes significantly which in return will HURT the little guy, the hard working individual?

Folks let’s face it, the House seat has been occupied for Jetton for six years and Winder wants to uproot him. I suggest Winder change his name to Whiner! Maybe he’ll do this come November!

When the lights go out...

2006-10-12T19:09:00.000-07:00

This is an interesting situation brewing with North Korea and their decision to test nukes. In fact on Thursday, Russia and China have decided to oppose tough sanctions that the United States wanted to impose against North Korea. The reason being they (Russia and China) wanted extra time to work out a more moderate response to Pyongyang’s nuclear test stemming from October 8^th.

China is against authorizing punishment such as economic sanctions, naval blockades, and military actions, and with Russia, wants to see sanctions focused mainly on the nuclear and weapons programs of North Korea. This sounds like something out of the entire ‘Let’s leave them alone so they’ll leave us alone” playbook.

Doing nothing will not solve the problem at hand. Using force, or in this case tough sanctions, can and will shut down the operatives of North Korea. The picture above is of North Korea at night and you can see the electricity being used. As one article title stated, “North Korea may have the bomb, but not the Electricity.”

IN MEMORY OF # 30...

2006-10-11T17:12:00.000-07:00

Being a former College baseball player and an avid fan of the Major Leagues, I would like to give heart-felt condolences to the Cory Lidle family as well as the families affected by today's tragic plane crash in New York City which killed Lidle and another passenger.

This is a testament of how lucky we are to have life and how fast it can be taken away from us. Hell, on Sunday I was watching Lidle on ESPN give an interview about what went wrong with the New York Yankees season. Who would have thought that three days later he would no longer be with us, to amaze us with his arm, or most importantly to amaze us as a husband to his wife and a father to his six year old son. Mr. Lidle, you may be gone but you will never be forgotten.

3/22/1972-10/11/2006

Story here

Mull this question over...

2006-10-09T06:50:00.000-07:00

Why are the very same Liberals and Democrats who thought the Boy Scouts should allow Gays to be Scout Leaders, are now upset that Foley was in charge of Pages in Congress?

Either it is ok or it's not, which one is it?

'Spin Writing 101' taught to you by AP writers...

2006-10-08T17:12:00.000-07:00

I am seeing more and more stories presented by the media with increasing demands to sway the public opinion just weeks before the upcoming election. The article I am referencing to can be linked here and the target is, in my opinion, an attempt by this writer (Liz Sidoti) to persuade Republican moms to switch their vote from the GOP to the Democratic Party. The feeling being that, "Everyone else is doing it, why not you?"

The mothers that Sidoti targeted were definitely misinformed to say the least as they were simply taking Liberal talking points and bringing them forth. There was mention of the economy tanking (which is not true), people not having money (I know plenty of people who have money because they spend wisely or should I say save wisely), problems with Hurricane Katrina (first starts with the local Government- Shame on Ray Nagin), problems with terrorism continuing on (terrorism will always be a way of life as we know it ever since 9/11). I am not trying to write poorly of these women but they, just like Jane Fonda, do not speak for the majority of women throughout the United States. If Sidoti would have tried harder I am sure she would not have been hardpressed to find women who remain behind the Republican Party.

One other thing about the article, Sidoti mentions the Democrats being able to win back control of the House and the Senate, but they fail to remember that they must maintain the seats they already have. Do I believe the Democratic Party will take back control, nope.

This involves more than just Republicans...

2006-10-07T17:48:00.000-07:00

"If the House ethics committee finds evidence of a Republican cover-up, many people could be in jeopardy, facing consequences that range from a mild rebuke in a committee report to a House vote of censure or expulsion."

This quote was taken from the following Story and my thinking about this is, why does this only have to be about Republicans? This is just as much about the Democrats who knew about this as it is about the Republicans, but this is another attempt to paint a different picture to the American society just weeks before the mid-term November Elections.

Talent on loan from God...

2006-10-06T17:40:00.000-07:00

“Liberals can’t afford to have history accurately recorded and interpreted, because it would constitute a total repudiation of everything they have stood for. Instead of admitting that they choose the easier route of distorting facts, an art they could easily have learned from their bedfellow, _____________.”

This was a quote I found from a book I am reading and I must say that the words written over fourteen years ago have just as much meaning today as they did back then. In all reality you can fill in the blank with whatever name you prefer such as Hugo Chavez, John Kerry, Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi, and the list goes on and on. The real name that completes this quote is Mikhail Gorbachev and this was taken from Rush Limbaugh’s book, “The Way Things Ought to Be” written in 1992. Thus proving that history repeats itself (especially with the Democratic Party) again and again and to think he did this with ½ his brain tied behind his back just to make it fair.

Do this for the World...

2006-10-06T12:33:00.000-07:00

Ramsey Clark, a former US attorney general (1967-69) who is one of Saddam Hussein’s lawyers, has said that any death sentence against the former Iraqi president would increase violence in the strife-torn country.

He was quoted as saying, “It seems clear that a guilty verdict will set off catastrophic violence...It’s hard to know how many Iraqis, dozens, hundreds, thousands, will die because of the sentence…”

If Hussein is found guilty and sentenced to death, the Iraqi law states he should be executed within 30 days. This is unbelievable that a former US attorney general is defending a horrible dictator such as Saddam Hussein. Damn right many Iraqis will die, but will the Democrats blame it on Bush and the War in Iraq or will they blame it on the death sentence handed to Hussein? Yet again Liberals are manipulating and attempting to destroy the thinking of Americans as well as citizens of the World.

'Political Corruption 101'...

2006-10-05T18:00:00.000-07:00

The Mark Foley email/IM sex scandal is quickly unraveling for the Democratic Party since Brian Ross of ABC surfaced the emails to the Nation and to the World. Examining the fallacies originally reported, let’s set this straight:

The lurid AOL Instant Messenger, Jordan Edmund, was 18 years old at the time (that debunks the idea of the page being 16-17 years old)
Two people close to Edmund have admitted the messages were part of an online prank that went awry
Those involved in the scandal are now fearful that their political careers will be affected if they are publicly brought into the investigation (Explains why Edmund now wants Stephen Jones (former Timothy McVeigh attorney) to represent himself.
Brian Ross claims he was too busy to report the emails due to the anniversary of Hurricane Katrina and September 11^th.

We, as a nation, were painted a picture by the Liberal media of Foley being a sick, twisted, no good child molester, taking advantage of young adults with the power he possessed with his political held office. Now granted, I do not condone the actions of Foley and I, like many others, am glad to see the resignation of Foley. However, the page was of legal consenting age and not the poor, innocent child that we were blatantly led to believe and now two people close to Edmund have admitted the messages were online pranks that went awry.

To think these individuals involved are fearful of their political careers potentially being affected is absurd. Guess what, their careers are over, now non-existent, put a fork in them because they are done. To think that a kid (18 years old) has truly messed the rest of their life up holds so much truth. Maybe Democrats will realize that what a kid does at an early age really does dictate how the rest of their life will turn out (i.e. doing well in school, doing drugs, etc. or in this case a prank that will forever tarnish the image of those involved from Foley to the pranksters.)

Also we have ABC’s Brian Ross who was just too busy to report the messages because of coverage he was doing for the one year anniversary of Hurricane Katrina and the five year anniversary of 9/11. Bull Shit. I call it, B.S. This is merely ‘Politics 101’ by the Democratic Party and let’s look at the time line of this Liberal propaganda:

Valerie Plame July
Downfall of the Bush Administration with Hurricane Katrina August
Politicizing of 9/11 by President Bush September
Lowering of gas prices by the Republican Party to gain votes September
Jeanine Pirro September
Mark Foley September

Fortunately for Americans this is backfiring on the corrupt Democratic Party.

Poll results...

2006-10-05T17:08:00.000-07:00

Poll Results from the previous week for "Would you give your support via Vote for Hillary Clinton, if she ran in the 2008 Presidential Election?"

Yes- She's already been in control for 8 years in the White House. (1 Vote) 4.5%
No- The U.S. cannot handle the Clintons back in office again. (20 Votes) 91%
Maybe- Depends who else is running. (1 Vote) 4.5%

Remember to vote in the new poll!!!!!

That's going to leave a Mark...

2006-10-02T11:18:00.000-07:00

The announcement of Congressman Mark Foley (R-FL) resignation over scandalous e-mail and text messages has dealt the Republican Party a huge and possible devastating blow just a few short weeks before the upcoming November mid-term elections.

Foley was considered the favorite to win the November 7^th Election until e-mails surfaced a few days ago pertaining to e-mail and instant messages sent by Foley to male pages. The latest word on Foley today is that the Congressman has checked himself into a rehabilitation center to help fight alcoholism.

To make matters worse, apparently the GOP have known about this e-mail sex scandal since 2005 and have done nothing to bring attention to the unethical behavior of Foley. This does not look good for the Republican Party as this can be a huge turnaround for the Democratic Party and their bid for winning back the House and the Senate.

The media a long with Democrats have been pushing topics such as the war in Iraq, Bush lying about the war efforts, decreasing of gasoline prices controlled by the Republican Party, etc. in an attempt to tarnish the public image of the Republican Party, however, this may do more harm than any of the conspiracy tactics used previously.

Don't Eat the Meat...devour it!

2006-10-01T18:10:00.000-07:00

I met up with an old class mate from high school (class of 1997) and must say that I lost a lot of respect that I had had at one point in time for the person. The class President, the one voted most popular, most likely to succeed and most likely to become President of the U.S. had settled into a career post college with the group PETA. This acronym stands for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, you might know them, they’re the ones who think we humans are bad because we grow animals for food.

Like I said, lost a lot of respect for my childhood friend as we discussed the past to the present, but mainly PETA man wanted to talk about the unfair treatment of animals. I could not figure out how the person who was deemed to be so successful ten years prior could be the same person representing cockroaches against Six Flags today.
The one point I tried explaining to Mr. PETA and he tried refuting was the concept that Humans are the most dominant being on Earth and there is absolutely nothing wrong with eating meat. Why should we feel bad for living in a country that strives so well and is able to have many farmers who supply our country with meat? Though, I am interested in starting a new type of PETA- People Enjoying Tasty Animals, any takers?

Global Warming & the Environmentalist Wackos...

2006-10-01T07:32:00.000-07:00

Global Warming is an interesting Political topic between Democrats and Republicans. From research Conservative-Majority conducted, this topic really became big in 1983 with politics as Democrats become consciously aware of our Environment. This intrigued me to take a look at a time line of events pertaining to Global Warming and what I found is the above statement to be false.

In fact Global Warming according to the timelines that we found were topics of interests to the American society in what appears to be Election years (1960, 1968, 1972, 1976, 1988, 1992, 2000, 2004). Take a look, yes the times are in Election years, but most importantly they are in Presidential Election years.

Environmentalists try to paint a picture of the Republican Party members hating Mother Earth while Democrats are the loving, caring type to our environment. There was a time period that we were warned that Global Warming was increasing the ice caps and now we are told that Global Warming is decreasing these ice caps and my question is which one is it?

Since the 1960’s, Democrats and wacko Environmentalists have been warning Americans and the world that in a decade Mother Earth will succumb to the evil works of Humans. Why that is a very egotistical statement to make! The latest kook statement is from Al Gore, in which he claims cigarette smoking is a “significant contributor to Global Warming!” According to wacko kooks the end of the World as we know it is going to occur within the next decade, unfortunately they’ve been saying this since the 1960s. Is Global Warming a topic that should truly be brought up and taken seriously in Politics?

Media creating Copy Cats

2006-09-30T16:10:00.000-07:00

When a person turns on the local television news, opens the local paper, or browses through Internet news, this can be disheartening in this day and age that we live in with all the negativity that is reported by our media. I am tired of hearing the negative effects of the Republican Party and how wonderful, neat and terrific the Democratic Party is. I wonder why we do not hear about the good that happens in our society such as one of the St. Louis Boy Scout groups having four young men achieve their Eagle Scout award. We are shielded by the media from the good that truly happens in our societies whether you live in St. Louis, Missouri, Billings, Wyoming, or even New Orleans, Louisiana.

The media publicizes this negativity and gives recognition to this evil only fueling the fire. Look at the man in Colorado who took the six females hostage, killing one before killing himself. Then Friday there was news of a Principal being shot and killed by a student in Wisconsin. The media publicity is continuously creating copy cats.

With that said, what is going to happen with the movie coming out portraying the assassination of President Bush? Logic tells me that there will be a copy cat and someone is going to attempt to kill our President. Democrats refuted the docudrama "Path to 9/11", but they are not refuting this movie. Why you ask? It is simple, I believe that deep down inside they want to get rid of President Bush because he has knocked the Democratic Party the hardest. He is the thorn in their side and when someone attempts the assassination of our President, not only should the person charged be held accountable but so should the Democratic Party for their part in allowing this movie to be played all across America.

A Democrat wanting to use the RELIGIOUS Golden RULE...and still cannot quote it right.

2006-09-29T09:08:00.000-07:00

“This is a time when the Golden rule should be in effect. Do not unto others, what you would not have them do unto your troops, your CIA Agents, Your People in the field.” -Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)

What the hell is that suppose to mean Ms. Pelosi? To think there is a freaking possibility she will be third in line to the President if she wins this coming November? These Democrats are not interested in protecting Americans, but their interests are in protecting the terrorists.

I am tired of the Democratic Party’s thinking that we are the ones who have made the terrorists upset. These same Liberal Kooks think President Bush started the war on America from Terrorists by retaliating against the actions of 9/11, but this is just not so. These terrorists have hated Americans for a while now, just look at the different attacks by al-Qaeda during the Clinton watch and all he wanted to do was send a couple of missiles at an ‘Aspirin’ factory five years after the initial attack (WTC bombing of 1993). Oh yeah, maybe he did that to take some attention off of him and the Lewinsky scandal.

Folks, the terror tribunals are about protecting us, the Americans, from the terrorists. The terrorists are our enemies, why do we need to be nice to them? For those who think if we leave them alone, they will leave us alone, you are an ignorant dumb ass. Their goal is to kill every American that does not convert, with the slogan being, “Convert or die” and these Democrats think we need to be nice. Fuck being nice.

Liberal Smear tactics...

2006-09-28T10:02:00.000-07:00

Driving to and from work everyday I enjoy listening to talk radio as it is my time to unwind or get geared up for the work day ahead of, or behind, me. Listening on a regular basis I have heard many acclaims by the media and I opened this mornings’ ‘USA Today’ paper and noticed contradictions in what I am hearing and what is being printed throughout the Liberal Media outlets via the Internet and newsprints.

Reading articles from the ‘USA Today’, and browsing through CNN.com and NYTimes.com a reader would form the opinion of the following:

The Economy is tanking with each and every passing day while under the Bush Administration
Unemployment is on the rise as the decrease in Economy slows industries and businesses down to a staggering halt
Gas prices are dropping as a result of the Bush Administration and the GOP
Home sales are on the decline because we, the participants in the Economy, are disgusted at the Economic failures of President George W. Bush and his policies

Let’s take a look at what is actually happening around us in the U.S. and let’s try to digest this information together. First on my list is the fact that the Economy is not actually tanking but is thriving as is evidence with the Dow Jones settling in at record highs that have not been this close since January of 2000. I am not exactly sure where the media gets off on this blatantly false tangent that the Economy is slumping, of course though President Bush is mentioned so let’s chalk this one up to a Liberal writer wanting to smear the Bush Administration and the Republican Party.

Next on my list of debunking this crap is the talk about unemployment increasing and the effects this has on the seemingly ‘slumping’ Economy. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics website, the unemployment rate is at 4.7% which is down from August (having a percentage of 4.8). Now folks do the math, these are not the staggering high numbers the media would want you to believe and in fact, the media never discloses the unemployment number they are speaking of. With that said, let’s chalk this one up to a Liberal writer wanting to, again, smear the Bush Administration and the Republican Party.

Are you beginning to see a pattern with where I am going? Pressing forward to the Gas prices, ‘USA Today’ conducted a gallup poll of 1000 participants and 42% of those polled see a direct correlation between the decrease in Gas and the Republican Party wanting to gain more votes this November. Well that blows my freshmen level ‘Economics 101’ class legitimacy out and maybe it is time for me to ask for an Educational refund from the University of Alabama. Here I thought the price of items was a direct influence of the supply and demand of the particular good(s). Just think that I proudly voted for George W. Bush, not once but twice, what was I thinking? I know he must have a ‘hotline’ where he picks up the phone and tells the person answering what the price of gas will be for that day. Hmmm, lucky 8 ball says $1.89. I hope you, the reader, can sense my sarcasm in this and maybe you too can realize that we need to chalk this one up to a Liberal writer wanting to smear the Bush Administration and the Republican Party.

The last topic that I noticed quick fallacies in was that home sales are dropping off and the market has become ‘cold’. That was one article and then the next article I clicked on had a completely different story all together. Let me debunk this for you- ‘New’ home sales are decreasing even though the mortgage rates have dropped tremendously lately but home sales have not dropped but have indeed picked up again. This completely contradicts the article which was written with an intent to sway public opinion that the Economy is shutting down and it is all Bush’s fault. This is not true though and I spoke with a member of the Home Builder’s Association and found out that expectant decreases in ‘New’ home sales occur every year about this time.

The big times to move are during the summer months when kids are out of school, that and no one wants to worry about buying a brand ‘New’ home just before the holiday season. It’s not because they are strapped on cash but because of inclement weather conditions which can possibly delay a house being built by adding up to four months past the original completion date. Again, let’s chalk this up to a Liberal writer wanting to smear the Bush Administration and the Republican Party.

Conservative-Majority readers- do not buy into this ploy of the Liberal Media whose obvious intent focuses primarily on destroying the public opinion of the Republican Party just five short weeks from the November 7^th Elections. Oh yeah, don’t forget about President Bush as well. The closer we get to election time the more outrageous the stories will become. This is not the mastermind of a conspiracy in work, but the mastermind of an Administration which is finally reaping what they sowed, beginning back in 2001.

Story 1
Story 2
Story 3
Story 4
Labor Statistics

Biach Say WHAT?!?!

2006-09-27T05:43:00.000-07:00

Does anyone have any ‘Bitch-b-gone’ spray that Conservative-Majority can borrow? Hillary Rodham Clinton (or Hitlery Rotten Clinton as we like to call her) is defending her promiscuous hubby, Bill, with attacks on Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice over which president, Clinton or George W. Bush, missed more opportunities to help prevent the September 11^th attack back in 2001.

Obviously this has broken out over the interview given by Bill Clinton to Fox News which aired on Sunday with Clinton making some outrageous comments about how obsessed he was in capturing Osama bin Laden and how this is a right wing conspiracy.

I do not want to get back onto the entire ‘I tried’ fiasco because we’ve already wrote about it, in fact Click Here to read it. But folks, do you realize this is all we will hear about if Hillary runs for the Democratic Presidential candidate in 2008 and actually wins? Bill will be back in the oval office yet again, using the coat tails of Hitlery to attempt to increase his legacy as a former President of the United States.

Results of the poll question asked...

2006-09-27T05:33:00.000-07:00

Did the Clinton administration do everything in their power to stop al-Qaeda?

Yes- it's all Bush's fault 9%
No- it's all about Accountability 91%
Maybe- if he would have left that woman alone 0%

I know he said the "N Word", I think...

2006-09-26T18:02:00.000-07:00

My first day writing for this site and already I have a hot topic as a "professor says senator used racial slur" title rotates through my Fox News Ticker on my desktop. After further review of this eye popping article, let me critique the situation here.

Story Here

First things first- Dr. Larry J. Sabato (director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics) and Dr. Ken Shelton (a radiologist) are both white. How often does it occur that a white accuses another white of bigotry? My experience has been very seldom that this occurs unless there is some reward or motivation behind this.
There is motivation all right, it is political motivation against Senator George Allen who has been criticized for using a racial slur in the 1970's. Now depending exactly on what year this supposedly occurred, there is a chance I was not even thought of.

Let's look at the fallacies of this case shall we? Sabato who knows Allen used the "n-word" would not tell The Associated Press how he knew. Could it be possible that this well quoted political science professor is just trying to get back in the news? So, Sabato knows Allen used the derogatory word, but then he tells Chris Matthews on MSNBC that "he did not know whether it was true that Allen used the word frequently…" Sabato is taking a technique right out of the Democrat playbook, that being start a defamation comment and then later on negate the full extent of what you said. I wonder if he was pointing his finger while talking to Matthews.

The downfall of this is that Allen used the word "macaca" referring to an opponent’s campaign volunteer of Indian descent. Why did he not use the word "Sand Nigger" since he used the “n word” so many times in the 1970s? Or could it be that he never used the “n word” and this is a desperation ploy by Democrats to gain votes come November?

Maybe someone can answer the reason why it took so long for this information to be brought up, reminds me of a case in the 1990s with the time delay. Does Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill ring a bell? She waited almost ten years to report Thomas and we all know how that worked out for her.

Who I am...

2006-09-26T10:12:00.000-07:00

I wanted to take the time to introduce to the Conservative Majority readers exactly who I am. I go by the name of ‘Maverick’, live in the greater St. Louis region, am an alumni of Washington University, and I am Black. If you ever pay attention to the media outlets, you would think I did not truly exist. Are you asking yourself yet why I would make that claim?

The answer is relatively simple, let me explain. I am a Black man who watches Fox News, I despise CNN, MSNBC, I question Black leaders not only in my society but throughout the United States and oh yeah, I support the Republican Party and stand behind President George W. Bush.

I am well educated with the ability to spell correctly, to formulate sentences which results into paragraphs. I do not speak Ebonics and I feel it is a shame for those who suffer from this ‘poor’ speaking ‘language’.

I personally contacted Diego because I want to inform the public through the eyes, the thoughts and the words of a Black man. I am not African-American, but a proud American of the United States of America. Forget my ancestry if you will because it does not play an integral part of my everyday life.

I do not care if I offend someone with the words that I write, I am not here for friends, popularity contests, etc. If you choose to rebut the words and messages that I write, back it up. This will save time for the writer and those of us reading the crap.

I do not play the race card because life is full of obstacles. Seemingly Liberals want to restrain me, hold me back from the advantages offered in this great society that we live in and in all reality they make me stronger to persevere and achieve greater excellence beyond their realm of thinking.

I look forward to this opportunity and thank you Conservative Majority readers.

##AP announced today the Democratic Slogan for the Presidential campaign of 2008, “Ask Us no questions, we’ll tell you no lies.”##

Welcome aboard...

2006-09-26T09:53:00.000-07:00

Conservative-Majority would like to take the time to announce the new addition to our team, Maverick. He and I go way back to my early, early college days and we look forward to having him on board to give us his insight.

I can already hear it now....

2006-09-24T19:34:00.000-07:00

The Conspiracies are being created with various stories being aligned. What could cause this? Well none other than gas prices being at a third straight two week drop. The national average gas prices are as follows

Regular $2.42 (previously $2.65)
Mid-Grade $2.53
Premium $2.64
Lowest Average price survey was in Des Moines, Iowa with the average regular price at $2.07/gallon.
Highest Average price survey was in Honolulu, Hawaii with the average regular price at $3.03/gallon.

Obviously this must be the works of the evil GOP, or you would think that from the various blog sites, interviews from CNN, MSNBC conducted by Liberals throughout the U.S. blaming the Republican Party.

I actually had an encounter earlier on a blog site (before I had completed this post) on how the Republican Party is conspiring against the Left by lowering the price of gas. Question: When will they (the Left) stop setting the stage for their defeats come November?

Since September 1^st, I have seen or read about the Republican Party doing the following:

Politicizing 9/11 to gain votes (Stupid conspiracies trying to place blame on the U.S. Government though history tells me terrorists picked September 11^th, not the GOP)
Lowering gas prices (Economics class taught me in 2003 that supply and demand affect the price, not the GOP)
IF (and it is a big if) Osama bin Laden is dead, this is a ploy by the GOP to gain more votes (Why not be excited an evil man is deceased?)

I will be glad when the days come that the Left can have some balls, be ‘Men’ so to speak and admit when they have been defeated instead of making excuse after excuse as to why they lost. Of course though, I would truly love to hear these excuses, both new and old, come November because obviously that would mean they (Democrats) were not as successful as they said they would be.

William, your word is Accountability...

2006-09-23T07:36:00.000-07:00

This story just came in from Reuters with Bill Clinton defending his administrations efforts in the pursuit of Osama bin Laden, while accusing the Bush administration of doing far less to capture bin Laden before the devastating attacks of 9/11.

Clinton blames Bush for bin Laden

You can read the article from the link listed above but in case you are too lazy to check it out, Clinton was quoted as saying,

“But at least I tried. That’s the difference in me and some, including all of the right-wingers who are attacking me now…They had eight months to try, they did not try. I tried. So I tried and failed.”

Clinton later on mentions the attack in October of 2000 of the USS Cole and said that if anyone wants to criticize him, they “can criticize me for this: after the Cole, I had battle plans drawn to go into Afghanistan, overthrow the Taliban and launch a full-scale attack search for bin Laden…”

Here is a prime example of Liberals trying to re-write history books with Clinton placing blame on the current administration. He stated that the Bush administration had eight months to do something and did not, but what about the Clinton administration?

Attacks before the USS Cole by al-Qaeda occurred in 1993, 1996, and 1998. What did the Clinton administration do then? If history and memory serves us right, he did not do much of anything. In fact he did not consider al-Qaeda a true threat to the United States and passed on the opportunity for the U.S. to obtain Osama bin Laden from Sudan. However, once again he failed because he was worried about socialistic issues and was not concerned with National Defense.

This interview comes just weeks after the docudrama ‘Path to 9/11’, which was seen as ‘indisputably wrong’ by Clinton. It amazes me how liberals want to have this perception about them as being perfect and when facts (not feelings or beliefs) are brought forward, they try to dispute the notion they are far from perfect. 'Path to 9/11' aside, why does he not mention the attacks listed above? Could it be that he realizes he truly failed and would not want to admit it for fear of what it would do to his reputation?

Maybe one day we, as Americans, will have the pleasures of hearing William Jefferson Clinton admit, let me say that again, admit, to not doing an adequate job in the pursuit of Osama bin Laden and yes his administration could have helped the Bush administration stop one of the most tragic days this country has seen in its history on U.S. soil.

**There are unconfirmed reports that Osama bin Laden died in August of 2006 of Typhoid. This story is developing and can be read about at Drudge Report.com **

This is for the Liberal AaronBarlow...

2006-09-22T18:27:00.000-07:00

So, ole aaronbarlow tried to attack myself and Crankyright and he has enabled comment moderation...if he doesn't like the comment, it will not get posted. Here is the piece of shit he wrote and below this link is my response. It is long and I do apologize...

Wah, Wah, Republicans are better, Wah, Wah

“Over the past forty years, the right has worked hard at developing strategies that would allow them to control public discussion in America. Long before Democrats figured out what was happening, the right had learned to frame the debate by controlling the terminology…almost completely because of the skills of the rightwing strategists.”

So basically you are calling the Democrats over the past 40 years dumb! These “skills” you talk about of the ‘rightwing strategists’- would that not be classified as intelligence?

“Today, they have to defend an administration whose policies have failed and continue to fail, and whose minions are showing up as corrupt on an almost weekly basis”

Let me ask you about the Clinton Administration- do you not consider lying under oath as a corrupt administration? I mean, let us look at his administration

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

“Second, people on the left have learned by example, and are now framing the national debates as skillfully as the right once did…”

Left learning by example implies you mean from the Right. So are you saying the left is too dumb that they must rely upon the Right for guidance and leadership skills?

“In the 1970s, the right saw a divide within the left that it could use for a number of purposes…”

What about this year, just recently, when the Left was divided yet again? You remember Joe Lieberman versus the Democratic Party? Or even Hitlery Rotten Clinton versus John “I have a plan” Kerry? I know, I know…what about John McCain, Warner or Lindsey? Can you say RINO? For those democrats that Aaron called dumb in the beginning, this stands for Republican in Name Only.

“Liberals believe in debate and in respect for opponents”

Respect for opponents? What’s your excuse for Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean, John Kerry, or even John Murtha- who seemingly have no respect for their opponents. Seems like all they care about is “scoring points and making their opponents look bad to whomever might be watching”, wait that’s your line…my bad.

“I didn’t have to look far before seeing a typical rightwing straw man…frame the debate in such a way as only the right can win…”

Please elaborate on how I ‘framed the debate in a way as only the right can win’? Examples were given to you by me and other Conservative-Majority readers, yet you chose to dismiss them. How can you honestly dismiss the ACLU? However you did.

I need your definition of what torture is/or should be. Essentially, no matter how you look at it, ceasing torture is being nicer to terrorists. The ACLU website (which you refused to accept) had an organizational member mention being nice because they (terrorists) are human, too. You can do the research, please realize that I cannot do both yours and my side in this. However, if you truly need leadership with this, I suppose you can rely upon me for guidance.

“Thing about us liberals is that we tend to want to keep on talking, hoping that the other side will eventually listen to reason”

Let’s be honest again, it has nothing to do with the other side listening to reason. It goes back to “if you say it enough, people will eventually believe it.” No wonder why we hear so much from Pelosi and Kerry.

“Yes, it does take a lot to make a liberal angry—it took an attack on Pearl Harbor for the liberal Roosevelt administration to go to war—but we can only be pushed so far.”

Too bad the 1993 WTC bombing (by al-Qaeda), 1996 Khobar Towers attacked (by al-Qaeda), 1998 U.S. embassies bombed (by al-Qaeda), 2000 USS Cole attacked (by al-Qaeda), did not push the Liberals far enough to be angry.

You say that you’re not going “to bother” to tell us during debates, but my question is this. Is it truly because you’re not going to bother or is it because if the right has to ask, then how in the hell would you know?

You write about mischaracterization, but come on professor, even Gilligan knows Liberals are more infamous for their character assassinations of the Right. “Appealing to history…Stick to what is going on now…”? On yeah, this is the Liberal excuse so no blame can be put on the Clinton years. *Please refer to the al-Qaeda attacks listed above.

Yes, the U.S. was the result of Liberal philosophies but professor you’re smart enough to realize the Liberals of today are different from yesteryear. Damn it, that’s right you want to forget history and go with what is happening now.

“We created the greatest country this world has ever seen and fought—and defeated—the greatest evils brought upon it…”

The greatest evils brought upon it…really inspiring words you’ve written. So, what is the Left’s plan to fight terrorism? Or to capture real evil that attacked the greatest country this world has ever seen under the watch of Bill Clinton?

AaronBarlow and Liberal friends- I urge you to respond and keep in mind Conservative-Majority will not disallow your comments. **Team members are standing by via e-mail if you need help with your debate at republican.majority@gmail.com.**

Stand by YOUR Man...

2006-09-21T12:31:00.000-07:00

Conservative-Majority would love to give a heartfelt ‘Amen’ to Representative Charles Rangel. In case you missed it, here is his quote

“An attack on Bush is an attack on all Americans… ‘You do not come into my country, my congressional district, and you do not condemn my President. If there is any criticism of President Bush, it should be restricted to Americans, whether they voted for him or not. I just want to make it abundantly clear to Hugo Chavez or any other president, do not come to the United States and think because we have problems with our president that any foreigner can come to our country and not think that Americans do not feel offended when you offend our Chief of State’…”

Conservative-Majority would also love to give a heartfelt ‘Are you feeling okay’ to Nancy Pelosi. In case you’ve been hiding under a rock lately, Pelosi, one of President Bush's fiercest political opponents at home, took his side on Thursday

"Hugo Chavez fancies himself a modern day Simon Bolivar but all he is an everyday thug,"… “Hugo Chavez abused the privilege that he had, speaking at the United Nations…”

Talk about questioning whether hell is freezing over as I type this, here is two Democrats, one from New York (Rangel) and the other is from California (Pelosi) actually defending our President. You know the very same President the Democratic Party keeps telling us, “Bush lied, People died”.

The way I look at it is this, Chavez’s comments are going to make a lot of Americans angry and it just so happens that Pelosi is trying to become the next Speaker of the House. If I was a gambling man I would put my money that Pelosi is using this to gain more votes in her November Election bid than to actually defend our President. Keep in mind Conservative-Majority readers, Democrats in the past three years have not been too far off of Chavez for what they have said about OUR Commander-in-Chief.

One of the many reasons as to Why I believe in Jesus Christ...

2006-09-21T08:41:00.000-07:00

"I remember them coming and kneeling by me," Viola said of the paramedics who came to her home. "I don't remember them carrying me out."

Her next memory is being bathed in a blue light and watching herself on an emergency room treatment table.

"I was a little bitty person, about this big," she said, holding her thumb and forefinger about an inch apart.

"I looked down, and when I looked down I saw myself, and I was blue, too," she said. "I remember floating in a blue cloud.

"I was watching myself and floating in this cloud, and somebody asked me do I need help? I said yes. I don't know where they took me or what they did."

For the entire story Click Here

Club Gitmo (Liberal Style)...

2006-09-20T12:37:00.000-07:00

For the Bush haters...

2006-09-19T05:28:00.000-07:00

I am tired of the President Bush haters saying that “Bush lied”, “Bush lied”, “Bush lied” and if they are going to claim this then it is time for them to read what other Democrats said about WMD in Iraq since1998. Maybe the anti-Bush groups will realize the truth when they hear their own speaking out.

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline Albright, 1998

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983" -- National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security." -- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

Liberal Media overlooks wrongdoing of Hollywood Left...

2006-09-18T10:13:00.000-07:00

The Hollywood Left has struck again and yet again their outlandish viewpoints have been completely ignored by the Liberal Media. Rosie O’Donnell claimed last week on “The View” that radical Christianity is “…just as threatening as radical Islam…” and says “…U.S. is bombing innocent people…”

Can you imagine if a Republican would make a comment paralleling the magnitude of O’Donnell? The individual or group would be chastised by the media and their characters publicly assassinated.

It amazes me how America has become so divided and I personally cannot remember so much hatred shown towards a President of the United States, especially by the Hollywood Left. It seems to me that they (Hollywood Left) look with admiration of Bill Clinton granting him a hero-like pedestal and have placed no blame on his lack of actions pertaining to the al-Qaeda attacks in the 1990’s.

Seemingly every statement from these Liberals correlates back to the messages of “Bush lied”, “impeach Bush”, or “blame the Bush administration”. Amazingly enough the word accountability appears to be non-existent in the vocabulary of these people when the point is brought up indicating that the Clinton administration could have done more than they did. On another blog I was recently told that, “we must not live in the past and must place blame on the current administration for America’s problems.” If in 2008 a Democratic Party member holds the office of our Commander-in-Chief, is it feasible to blame America’s problems on the current administration or will there be continuous blame placed on the Bush administration? Obviously this is a rhetorical question that I already know the answer to.

Last is the “scholar” from the New York City College of Technology who tried to rebuttal the statement I had previously made in another Conservative-Majority post in regards to Club Gitmo (Guantanamo Bay). Thus proving the known issue of our society problems with Liberal professors, their ideology and what is being taught to our youth. I paid my dues in college with Liberal professors and having to deal with their un-American ideas being strung throughout the class curriculum and I know this is only going to get worse.

Proud to be an American...Where at least I know I'm Free...

2006-09-16T21:42:00.000-07:00

“America: Land of the Free and Home of the Brave”. Not too long ago this statement had significant meaning to our great country that we live in. We took pride in being an American and it left us with that special feeling deep inside the heart. Then our society started changing especially with more and more Liberal kooks coming to the American Spotlight.

Think about it. Liberals think we are too mean to terrorists and we need to treat them with more respect because after all they are human, too. The Jane Fonda’s of our society need to shut the hell up and realize they are part of the problem. Looking back over the last ten to fifteen years the face of the Democratic Party has changed dramatically. There was a point in time the Democratic Party represented the working people, the good ole boys of society, but now more and more people are switching parties to the Republican/Conservative side, the Silent Majority. Why? Simply because of people like Michael Moore, John Kerry, Al Gore, just to name a few. There should really be two Democratic Parties, the true Democrats and then the Liberals. This would cover your socialist, your Hollywood Left and your plain old nut jobs and true Democrats would not have to associate with the others (Liberals) when they (Liberals) speak out against America. Yes, I said speak out against America because it seems that is all Liberals want to do.

I am an extremely proud American and I love the Republican Party and no I do not always agree with them 100% of the time, but I tell you what, I could not convert to a Liberal way of thinking even if my life depending upon it. I’ve had people denounce OUR President Bush to my face and I think it is sad that this is a portion of the mentality of our citizens, our neighbors, our friends, our families. All I have to say is if you do not like the way America is run, go to another country and then maybe, just maybe, you might realize how Great it truly is to be a Proud American Citizen.

Quote of the day...

2006-09-14T17:50:00.000-07:00

"I'm prepared to kick their ass from one end of America to the other."

-John Kerry

jgjaogjoawowgngnsojsjgososog

Sorry about that folks, see I talk with my hands and when I read John Kerry's quote, about his determination to run for the Presidency of 2008, I could not stop laughing hysterically.

Everytime I hear twenty-one guns...

2006-09-13T19:38:00.000-07:00

This blog is dedicated to all the soldiers who have fallen defending our Country’s honor and most importantly the freedom that we have as citizens of the United States. When our men and women join the different branches of our military they take an oath to come to our duty when needed. Unfortunately we have had over 2,500 soldiers killed during the war in Iraq and the Bush administration along with the GOP is coming under scrutiny from the Democratic Party for these deaths. However when a soldier is brought home for that final time, one would think it would be a time to show proper respect for the fallen brother or sister whether you agree or disagree with our efforts in Iraq.

Unfortunately not all Americans feel that way. In particular I am talking about Fred Phelps and the ‘Westboro Baptist Church’ gang. In case you are unfamiliar with who I am talking about this group has began picketing the funerals of U.S. soldiers who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan as a way of demonstrating rage directed toward a government that they believe is tolerant of homosexuality. The group has employed the same tactics against the gay community of nationwide events.

A Conservative-Majority reader sent me an informative e-mail about Phelps and his gang attending a funeral in Jackson, Missouri of fallen soldier, Army Cpl. Jeremy R. Shank (18 years old), on the 17^th of September, 2006. If you live in the area (Southeast Missouri) I urge you to attend the funeral to pay your respects for an individual who gave his life for you and me. Remember, while you’re sleeping tonight in your cozy bed, our men and women will be protecting our freedom.

*This is for the funeral of Army Cpl. Jeremy R. Shank.
09/17/2006 1:45 PM - 2:30 PM
Jackson, MO
First Baptist Church of Jackson
212 S. High St.

Democrats doing the politicizing...

2006-09-12T17:36:00.000-07:00

Yesterday was the five year anniversary for the tragic events of September 11^th that changed many people’s lives forever. I, like many others, spent Sunday and Monday night watching the ABC special, “Path to 9/11” and no this blog is not directed toward the real-life failures of the Clinton Administration, but instead is focusing upon the reaction given by the Democrats pertaining to President Bush’s speech at 8:00 pm CST last night.

In case you are unaware of last night’s speech, top Democrat Party members feel the president used the national address commemorating 9/11 to make partisan arguments bolstering support for the Iraq war. Nancy Pelosi, who has been mentioned on Conservative-Majority, stated “Rather than try to defend their own failed record, Republicans have resorted to the desperation politics of fear…”

Then there is also Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-NV, who feels “the president spoke for his administration, not for the nation…this was a political move, designed to tap the overwhelming public sentiment to destroy al-Qaeda as a way to bolster sagging public support for the war in Iraq.”

I find it amusing that the Democrats actually believe or maybe expect that they will be able to force President Bush off his positioning with the war in Iraq and Terrorism. How do the Democrats think they will be able to handle this better than the GOP, do they actually think they can be diplomatic, negotiate or reason with these Islamic Fascists?

Let’s be honest here, everything the Democrats are accusing the Republican Party of is exactly what they (Democrats) are guilty of doing themselves. Democrats are the ones politicizing the issues, for instances, look at gasoline. The decrease at the pumps according to Democrats is, “obviously a tactic before elections by the Republican Party”. They accuse President Bush of politicizing last night’s address, right before the elections, but if memory serves me right (no pun intended), 9/11 happened months before the typical election season due to Terrorist members of al-Qaeda, not of the GOP.

Effects of 9/11 (Part III)

2006-09-09T22:46:00.000-07:00

This is the third and final tribute to the victims and victims’ families of 9/11. I started writing this and I have decided to change my approach to attempt to answer the questions put forth by Darwin pertaining to the first 9/11 blog. Hopefully this can give more insight to how I feel and I hope more of you will comment to show people like Darwin that we support our Commander-in-Chief and most importantly our Country.

Let’s start at the beginning with George Bush and his administration. Cranky Right put it best when he documented that Dubya had only been in office for a total of Two Hundred Thirty-Four days when we were attacked. Calling his administration helpless is hardly even fathomable let alone absurd especially when you consider how the United States was affected by al-Qaeda, remember 1993, 1995, 1998, 2000.

As for the bin Laden connection, everyone knows that there were many of Osama bin Laden’s family here in the United States and yes they were flown out of the country on private jets, but Osama is the odd ball out in his family. Thus, you were correct when you said I would probably use the word “Black Sheep” and I will, because that is what he is. There was a comment made that Bush could have gotten bin Laden, but let me ask the question, what about Clinton? Again, Cranky Right makes an excellent point with his question about the Butterfly Effect.

For the report that just came out, when did Bush ever say that al-Qaeda had connections with Saddam Hussein? Democrats are trying to undermine our President and this country while complaining about a “Docudrama” literally slamming the Democratic Party. With that said, two years ago Michael Moore came out with Fahrenheit 9/11 and Moore became the “Rock star” of the DNC. Then the (Michael Moore) movie was seen as Freedom of Speech, but this docudrama needs to be censored out, what is the deal?

For the War on Terrorism, how about rooting for our side you freaking Liberal moron? In all honesty, that is beside the point and what it comes down to is that five years ago we were dealt a huge blow. We need to continue to support our President, our Nation, our Troops the same way we did immediately following 9/11 and re-unite as “One Nation under God”.

Effects of 9/11 (Part II)

2006-09-08T02:48:00.000-07:00

*This is the second part of the three part blog dedicated to the events leading up to and following September 11^th, 2001.*

The first concept I want to examine is the bias spin put on by the Liberal Media and how they (the Media) have been successful influencing the values of our American society. Particularly the media has maintained a strong focus upon President George W. Bush and his administration pertaining to the events pre and post 9/11, while seemingly forgetting about the two-term presidency of Bill Clinton prior to Bush being in office.

It has been a known issue, for many years dating back past the presidency of Jimmy Carter, that when Democrats are in office or have control the thought process of the Democratic Party is to cut expenditures on programs pertaining to National Security, Defense programs, while seemingly throwing money towards socialist programs such as healthcare.

For the first One Hundred Sixty-Five years of our Country’s existence, National Defense consisted of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Our first true taste of attack from abroad did not occur until December 7^th, 1941 with the attack on Pearl Harbor. This opened the door to what would lead to the attacks on 9/11. One must question whether an attack would have been thwarted, if a Republican would have been in office from 1992 to 2000? Obviously chances are relatively high that spending would have gone into National Defense programs and I would like to think that a Republican would have taken Sudan up on their offering of Osama Bin Laden.

In present day we have groups that believe we are not winning the War on Terrorism, but one has to seriously doubt these beliefs every time there is a dramatic situation involving terrorists. For example, the capturing of Saddam Hussein, the killing of his sons, the assassination of Zarqhawi, and every other development that will occur thanks in large part to President Bush's War on Terrorism. When something of the magnitude occurs as previously mentioned, this deals a devastating blow to the platform of the Democratic Party. Momentum swings greatly in the favor of the GOP when announcements as such are released to the American public as well as the World.

One of my favorite Bush quotes is, “…We have to be successful 100% of the time…while terrorists only need to be successful once…” This comment is not complex in the least but says it all. Unfortunately it appears that Democrats are anxiously waiting for the Bush Administration to fail, when it should be trying to support our Country’s Commander-in-Chief.

Of course though, it might actually take another attack on our Land of the Free to wake up these individuals and groups to the seriousness of what Terrorists throughout the World are trying to do to our Western Civilization. Their goal is simple, it is to annihilate the American society as we know it.

In our society though, when things are going good we seem to be a divided country and when something bad happens such as a 9/11, we seem to try to unite as one. Why must it take something of magnificent negativity or devastation to bring families, friends, neighbors, and even strangers together?

Effects of 9/11 (Part I)

2006-09-07T04:00:00.000-07:00

I recently received an e-mail from a reader in the Northeastern portion of the United States requesting a topic written upon the tragic events of September 11^th, 2001. This is the first of three blogs pertaining to the upcoming anniversary of 9/11 and all three are dedicated to the victims, families and friends affected by the most gruesome attack on American soil in sixty years.
-Diego

The time is nearing for the Five year anniversary of one of the most devastating blows on American soil in recent history. The death count has fluctuated from time to time but the most consistent number tallied 2,823 people killed. These people were Fathers, Mothers, Grandparents, Sons, Daughters, Brothers and Sisters and in a matter of minutes they were gone from their families forever.

Everyday life as we know it was forever changed when the attacks were brought on American soil. Terrorism has become a way of life not only throughout the World but also in the greatest Nation ever.

Do you remember where you were when it was announced the planes had hit? I do and at the time I, just like those around me, did not understand what was taking place that being America was under attack.

Think back to how it felt that treacherous day. Contemplate how distraught we as a collective group had become. Remember the “Rally around the flag” mentality, or how President George W. Bush was supported by the majority of Americans with the thought of the U.S. being equipped with a fearless leader. The days following led to major Patriotism towards the United States, in which talk radio stations played clips of men and women alike talking about enlisting in the military to defend our Country. I remember one individual who said, “Give me a gun and I’ll kill ‘em all.”

Flash forward to the year 2006 and at first glance it appears that many Americans have forgotten the pain and sorrow felt that day. The Left of our society has twisted the opinions and the views of many fellow Americans into believing 9/11 was the direct failure of the Bush Administration.

There is even a conspiracy group of seventy-five academia scholars who have been brewing ideas paralleling the Bush Administration with the attacks of 9/11. The members of this group are educated, as mentioned above they are academia in our Nation’s colleges and universities. This very academia is the same professors who are teaching our college youth of America. I must admit that I am deeply relieved that my college days are behind me and I have almost two decades until I will have to worry about these people teaching my children. Though if history remains consistent those teaching our children, our grandchildren and even our great-grandchildren will be those with the Liberal bias towards society.

Some Americans must have the brain capacity of a gnat due to the memory loss pertaining to how weak Bill Clinton’s actions towards Al-Qaeda were in the 1990’s. If actions would have been taken following the 1993 bombing of the WTC, the 1996 Khobar Towers, 1998 bombing of 2 U.S. embassies, or in 2000 when the USS Cole was attacked, we could have potentially prevented future attacks by stopping al-Qaeda. Even if Clinton would have taken Sudan up on the 1996 Bin Laden offer, we (as Americans) could possibly be living life without the painful memories of that early September 2001 day.

We'll Teach 'EM What THEY Need to Know...

2006-09-05T18:00:00.007-07:00

A St. Louis federal judge has ordered a school district in the boot heel of Missouri to refrain from school-initiated/sponsored prayer or other religious activities. The ruling calls for the district to abide by the policy of separation of church and state and forbidding the espousal of religious faith.

For the full story Click Here.

One of the quotes from the article was “…Parents, not principals, get to choose whether their children are exposed to religious activity. It’s not the job of public schools to proselytize.”

With that said, why are Public schools teaching the students subjects such as Safe Sex, the basis of the Islam RELIGION, or how the Bush Administration is hurting America? If it is not the place of the School Administration to promote Religion, it should not be the place of the School Administration to promote Condoms. Plain and Simple. Shouldn't the Parents, not the School Administration, get to choose whether their children are exposed to these topics?

Ready or not...HERE WE COME!!!!

2006-09-03T21:14:00.000-07:00

It is Sunday night, and I am finally back in front of a computer and reading through Yahoo! News and the one article that jumps out at me is 'No.2 al-Qaeda Leader in Iraq Arrested'.

No. 2, Abu Humam or Abu Rana, was captured just north of Baghdad along with a group of his aides and followers. Keep in mind that he is only behind Abu Ayyub al-Masri, who took over after Zarqawi was killed in early June.

How exciting is this? I mean really think about all that we hear from the Democrats and how we "don't need this war and we're just looking for a fight". Every time we capture or kill someone with high official rank with al-Qaeda, we are disproving the Democrat theory each and every time. Our efforts in Iraq are making this World a better place not only for you and me, but for everyone else.

I am sure that as we draw nearer to the November Elections, there will be a few more al-Qaeda members that we will be able to cross off the wanted list and this is only going to help the Republicans in the eyes of the Public. A little bit more equals success and the public will be swayed when we keep proving our tactics succesful.

Have a Great Holiday Weekend!!

2006-08-30T18:43:00.000-07:00

Just wanted to write you to let you know that I am stepping away from the computer for a couple of days and should be back in true blogging form on Saturday. I am making a trip to the Great State of Missouri to spend some time with Family. Feel free to participate in any of the blog topics and if you have a Great or Horrible experience this Labor Day, feel free to share it with us. Once again, Have a Great Holiday Weekend and Be Safe.

History Lesson:

Labor Day, the first Monday in September, is a creation of the labor movement and is dedicated to the social and economic achievements of American workers. It constitutes a yearly national tribute to the contributions workers have made to the strength, prosperity, and well-being of our country.

YOU never know who is listening...

2006-08-29T12:42:00.000-07:00

CNN's Kyra Phillips had a major What-wo during President Bush's speech regarding the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. I wonder how her relations with her "controlling" sister-in-law will be after this girl's room conversation was aired?

Battle of the Show-Me State...

2006-08-28T20:01:00.000-07:00

In Missouri, the Show-Me State, there is a wire-to-wire race between incumbent Senator Jim Talent and State Auditor Claire McCaskill. The winner could determine control of the Senate. I recently received an e-mail from one of our loyal readers, KWilcox, regarding McCaskill and her November Election bid.

I was reading 'U.S. News World & Report' and lo and behold, there was a story about the Missouri Senate race. According to the article, McCaskill is "linking Talent to Bush with Krazy Glue, never missing an opportunity to say something like "The White House ought to just take a room in Missouri, they're here so often helping Jim Talent" as well as "...McCaskill is taking a page from the GOP playbook, campaigning in rural parts of the state."

Here is where KWilcox's e-mail comes into play with this story. What the Liberal magazine did not tell us was the quote McCaskill gave to a Kansas City Buzz blog pertaining to this topic. McCaskill's statement goes like this, "I made a big mistake, we made a big mistake assuming that people in rural Missouri don't care as much about college education tuition, health care, being able to afford a tank of gasoline...Even though Republicans have been the ones talking to them and listening to them for the last 10 years, they fundamentally understand this is not going right, that something is terribly wrong in the direction this country is going in."

Now, how can someone honestly want to give their vote to someone like a Claire McCaskill when she has clearly underestimated the intelligence of the people she wants to represent? Of course though, this is the same woman who is using her mother to gain supporters by having her (mom) go to gas stations throughout the rural areas of Missouri and blame the High Gas Prices on Senator Jim Talent, Governor Matt Blunt, as well as the Bush Administration to others while they are filling their tanks up. The McCaskill's are targetting the uneducated and mis-informed fools in these areas.

Missourians, please "Show Me" the state is smart enough not to elect Claire McCaskill come November.

Awwwww......SHUT UP!

2006-08-28T18:44:00.000-07:00

John Kerry (D-Mass.) is back at it again. No it’s not saying, “I’ve got a plan”, but he is again jumpstarting the same allegations he had after the 2004 Election, that Democrats were discriminated against during the election. However, that seems to be the Democrat response as soon as they lose any election. Just look at Kerry in ’04, Gore in 2000 and Cynthia McKinney in this past primary (in Georgia).

According to Breitbart.com, “an e-mail will be sent to 100,000 Democratic donors Tuesday asking them to support U.S. Rep. Ted Strickland for Governor of Ohio. The bulk of the e-mail criticizes Strickland’s opponent, GOP Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, for his dual role in 2004 as President Bush’s honorary Ohio campaign co-chairman and the state’s top election official.

The question remains of when Democrats will begin to take Accountability for their actions and stop blaming others for their mishaps and misconduct?

2008- GOP ALL THE WAY!!!

1st Female Speaker of the House?? Hopefully NOT!

2006-08-27T19:59:00.000-07:00

What will the U.S. be like, if in about 70 days or so, we refer to Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) as Ms. Speaker of the House. That's right, just third in line to the seat of the Presidency. If you've listened to Sean Hannity in the past few months you have heard him mention this quite often.

Pelosi has been embraced by Liberal Democrats and in a 1996 interview she said, "I pride myself in being called a liberal" and "I don't consider myself a moderate." However, some Democrats have distanced themselves from her and think Pelosi's leftward tilt, combined with her attacks on Bush, undercuts her ability to be a strong party leader.

What do you think Pelosi's chances of actually winning in November are? And if you think she will win, how do you think she will wreck havoc on President Bush's final two years?

Indiana School ACTUALLY backs Principal's decision...

2006-08-27T18:22:00.000-07:00

Interesting story out of Hammond, Indiana where a Principal, at Morton High School, suspended 128 students for violating the school dress policy. The surprising information about this story is that the school board members actually support the Principal.

The students, representing about 10% of the student body, were suspended for wearing baggy pants, low-cut shirts, tank tops and graphic T-shirts, as well as students using cell phones during classes.

This is very surprising, in this day and age, for the school board to actually support an administrator like this. Typically the ACLU would have already been called in throwing their legal mumbo-jumbo, gonna sue ya lingo around. Not the case just yet. Of course though, the ACLU is probably still busy in Shreveport, Louisiana where Black kids were forced to give up seats to White kids. I cannot believe something like this would still happen in 2006.

Hurricane Katrina only impacted city of New Orleans...(sure).

2006-08-27T15:09:00.000-07:00

A year has almost passed since the devastation of Hurricane Katrina, but unfortunately (in my opinion) as we get closer and closer to the anniversary, we are beginning to hear more and more about the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

Why is it that we hear of the people in Ray Nagin's area bitching and complaining about Hurricane Katrina, but we really do not hear anything from Hurricane Katrina victims who were living in Alabama and Mississippi. It's been all about the F'ing City of New Orleans. City of Sin.

Why are these people still feeling sorry for themselves? I was watching MTV and there was a man on there saying, "I ain't been able to get a job I like, and the Government don't want to help none." How ignorant? How about try to help yourself out and better yourself?

Enjoy being an Expectant Mother for up to 72 hours...

2006-08-24T20:00:00.000-07:00

It was announced out of Washington that females, over the age of 18 years old, may buy the morning-after pill known as Plan B. But there’s a catch, the individual must show proof they are of legal age. For those individuals seventeen and under, they will need a doctor’s note to buy the pills.

Plan B is a concentrated dose of the exact drug found in many regular birth-controlled pills, allowing a woman to ingest the pill within 72 hours of having unprotected sex. Doing this lowers the risk of pregnancy by up to 89 percent.

Once again going back to accountability, why is stepping up and holding one accountable for their actions so hard to do? Instead, the FDA might as well be broadcasting, “Have Sex…Enjoy it…Wait 3 days…No worries…We’ll Kill the baby for you.”

Sounds simple enough, right? But guess what…the pills have no effect if a woman is already pregnant. So now, we’re going to have women popping Plan B’s like they’re tic-tacs and I have to wonder what the effect will be not only on the Mother, but the baby inside. Remember, Sperm meets Egg, Egg Fertilizes, and baby is produced. Plan B scores an “F” if the woman is already knocked up.

This is a horrible decision because this is going to lead females to a feeling that is a false sense of security, especially since it is known to be not as effective as regular birth control. Then, you’ve got to think about the predators that will potentially rape minor females and force the pill upon the victim.

I hope this topic riles you up as much as it does me. By the way, free condoms will be distributed out this Friday at my niece’s 5^th Grade Show-and-Tell. Slogan on poster, “If you don’t wear the GLOVE, you don’t get any LOVE”. Hello, why not change the slogan of Public schools to, “XYZ High School- Where OUR Students Study in SPURTS!”

White man, Black man, Asian and a Hispanic...tell me if you've heard this one before?

2006-08-24T18:16:00.000-07:00

This post is in regards to one of the comments pertaining to voting and T.V. shows such as 'Survivor'. I find it ironic that the show was brought up and then lo and behold, this morning I open my Internet browser (Firefox) to Yahoo! News and I read about Survivor dividing the 4 tribes in accordance to Ethnicity for the upcoming season.

Whites, Blacks, Asians, Hispanics. Now if this is not a shock, I do not know what is. Think about last year, dividing the tribes based on Men Vs Women/ Young Vs Old and there was an outcry of discrimination then.

What is going to happen when this season begins? As I write this now, I glanced over headlines on Drudge Report and one of the captions stated, "NYC Officials call for Survivor to be pulled". I, probably just like you, realize that the "D" word is going to be thrown all around this fall as tribes compete on a daily basis, but there can be only one Survivor. In case you're wondering, the "D" is discrimination. I wonder which group will be the first to yell the "R" word (no, not Recount)? I'm sure the ACLU is honing their skills because I am sure there will be lawsuits out the wahzoo.

My question for you, the reader, is- Do you think it is a good idea for Survivor to divide the tribes based on ethnicity and what are the repercussions that will come of this?

Make this one count.

2006-08-22T18:02:00.000-07:00

Reading the news today, I found many topics pertaining to the upcoming Election and on my drive home it seemed like I went past every advertisement for candidates on the local November ballot. This made me think about elections in general and how as an American society we have low voter turnout. For instance, look at the Connecticut primary which had a whopping 15% turnout. Unbelieveable!

I have to wonder how many people who complain about this Party's platform or that Party's platform are guilty of being one of those who choose not to vote, ignoring the polls all together? My way of thinking is this- If you do not exercise your right to Vote, do not exercise your right to Bitch. Plain and simple.

With that said...We have been receiving a huge number of participants with this blog and I wanted to take the time to give everyone a chance to participate with this particular blog topic. My question for you is this, why does our society have such a low turnout when it comes to Local, State and National Elections? Liberal, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, whatever...voice your opinion now.

Pissing on the wrong Bush...

2006-08-21T20:14:00.000-07:00

Limestone County, Alabama- A decision has been announced concerning a teacher's career in the Northern Alabama county. Steve White, a Junior High Science teacher, will not be reinstated at West Limestone Middle School. The verdict was decided by Judge Joe Battle and was equipped with a 36 page review of the case.

For those unaware of the situation, White had shown a derogatory e-video bashing President George W. Bush to one of his 8th grade classes, in which one of the students complained leading to a more detailed investigation. Also, school officials found pornography on the teacher's classroom desktop which White accused students of downloading the pornographic material. However, reports surfaced that White allegedly showed this adult material to some of his classes.

People wonder what is wrong with our society, and it is because of Educators like White. He bashes Bush, looks at porn on his school computer and it gets better folks. He has dreams of running on the November Democratic ticket for the State House District 4 seat. The Alabama Democratic Party said Monday afternoon that he had not withdrawn from the race as it had requested.

It's getting HOT in here...

2006-08-21T13:57:00.000-07:00

A Danish Study determined Greenland's Glaciers have been shrinking for the last 100 years. The research suggests the ice melting is not part of the recent global warming hype the Democrats have suggested. Al Gore-keep on flying your jet; Senator Obama- keep on driving your SUV to and from your conferences about the effects of Global Warming.

The study was conducted by Researchers from Aahrus University with the sole focus upon 247 of 350 glaciers of Disko Island. This study began at the end of the 19^th Century and recently finished with the following information:

-70% of glaciers have been shrinking since the 1880’s
-Largest Reduction in the size of Glaciers occurred from 1964 to 1985
-Any temperature increase normally takes 10-20 years to be present in research
(More information will be released later on Monday)

Now, who wants to bet that this story does not make a huge splash in the news? Why you ask? Because this disproves what the Democrats like Obama and Gore have been preaching to the American Society for years now. The Liberal media would not want to report information discrediting the DNC and their platforms. Instead we will hear how the War on Terrorism is wrong, how we need to cut-and-run, how ineffective the Bush administration has become, etc. It will not be very long until the Democrats have a rebuttal to this research, in fact, I’m sure Al Gore is probably doing his own research of his own as you read this.

I scratch your back...You scratch mine?

2006-08-20T14:51:00.000-07:00

The city of St. Peters, Missouri announced Friday on STLToday.com the arrest of their Mayor, Shawn Brown, on charges of soliciting and accepting $2,750 in bribe money from a company wanting to install red light cameras in St. Peters.

According to the federal indictment, “Brown, 34, told an employee of Redflex Traffic Systems Inc. he would veto a measure approving the purchase of Redflex’s cameras unless the company paid him off.

On the 16^th of June, legislation was approved in the purchase of Redflex’s digital red light and speeding enforcement system. According to the indictment, “the following week a Redflex employee stopped by Brown’s house to deliver the $2,750 check.”

Brown was elected as the mayor in 2004, without having prior political experience, winning against a twenty year incumbent. This is just another scenario of high officials in the public eye crumbling with the power they possess. Though this is at the lower level of Government, the temptations obviously have higher stakes and more incentives for politicians to turn to greed. One of the things that plague our society is the rising number of dirty Politicians.

Chocolate City brought to you by Nestle Quik!

2006-08-18T19:41:00.000-07:00

Today, New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin blamed racism and government bureaucracy for delaying the city's ability to recover from Hurricane Katrina which occurred a year ago 29 August.

Nagin commented that if this would have happened anywhere else, the response would have been different. According to pre-Katrina statistics, New Orleans' population was 460,000 comprised of 60% black. Currently the city's population is around 250,000 and has been there for sometime. Earlier this year, Nagin called on fellow blacks to return New Orleans to a "chocolate" city. What would happen if someone, say in Metropolis, Illinois (Home of Superman) would say, "help us turn this into a vanilla city!" The ACLU would be showing up with some major Kryptonite.

Unfortunately it seems that people are too quick to play the race card in this day and age as well as becoming more and more sue happy. Nagin, like other Democrats, relish on playing the emotions of the uneducated and uninformed. What happened to the days when people took accountability for their actions and instead of blaming others, tried to do for themselves?

Baby Hit It 1 MORE Time...

2006-08-16T17:10:00.000-07:00

Britney Spears and hubby, Kevin Federline, are expecting baby # 2 just eleven months after Sean Preston was born. In an interview, Spears (8 months pregnant) said, "It just kind of happened...I'm going to wait a while for the next (one)!" Someone please explain the birds and bees to Britney, obviously babies do not "just kind of happen".

Spears has had huge popularity as a "pop" singer and has become more famously known for her parenting skills or should I say lack thereof. She expressed concerns of having babies so close together and that the entire pregnancy has been stressful.

What would the Liberal Media's response be if the couple had decided to abort the baby? Would the media outlets continue on the Liberal way and support this abortion or would they attack Spears and Federline based on artices written concerning the couple of not being the best of parents? Hmmmm.....??

Damn Technology...

2006-08-15T13:10:00.000-07:00

Cynthia McKinney has made her 1^st public appearance since losing her primary race last week. Shortly after the defeat, McKinney blamed the loss on the media and problems with electronic voting machines. That was last week.

Today- McKinney was quoted as saying, “…the Black community needs to oppose electronic voting machines…which are designed to steal elections.” She later said that she considered herself a “black political paramedic” and “black body politic is near comatose”.

Yet another case of a Liberal being unable to take accountability for their actions and here’s a question. If McKinney is a “black political paramedic”, was she trying to resuscitate the Capitol Hill Officer she punched? I didn’t think so.

Another example of the Democrat Party whining and crying when they lose, always someone else’s fault, though I wonder if any Liberal out there in Bloggerland is actually willing to go to bat for McKinney on this one?

You Go Joe!!

2006-08-15T07:06:00.000-07:00

According to reports from Yahoo! News, Senator Joe Lieberman will be able to fund his re-election bid for his Senate seat come November. Lieberman will be able to rely heavily upon those contributors who helped him raise money in 2003-2004, but most importantly, since deciding to run “Independent” he is gaining support from Connecticut Republicans. From the article, many Republicans do not feel the candidates for the Republican Party are as strong as Lieberman and they are willing to cast their vote for “Good Ole Joe”!

Looking at Ned Lamont, who seems to be very extreme in his views, could it be advantageous for Lamont to win come November? Look at how it would favor the GOP, having Lamont in the Senate during the 2008 presidential campaign so that Republicans could say to voters, “Look at what we’re running against.”

Liberals are like a pretzel...very twisted.

2006-08-13T12:04:00.000-07:00

The blog topic today is something that I have been thinking about for a couple of weeks now and I have decided to put my thoughts viewable to you, the reader. I am trying to understand the thought process of Liberals.

By examining this, this leads an individual to believe that Liberals are truly twisted in their way of thinking. I remember a time when telling ½ the truth was considered a lie, that is, until Democrats began using this tactic in Politics. This brings me to the Liberal Media, and how can someone listen to this bile and actually believe what they hear?

Flipping through the channels, stopping on CNN, MSNBC, I wonder what happened to being a proud citizen of the United States? A friend of mine was telling me that when he was growing up in Maine, it was common to walk into a store and see a picture of the President of the United States. What happened with that thought? Perhaps Clinton’s antics and scandals stripped Americans of this pride?

On Saturday I had a conversation (if you can consider it that) with a Liberal and I kept noticing that the gentleman kept on referring to how he “felt” and what he “thought”. As a Conservative, I do my best to give facts when proving a point. What I learned from the conversation with the Lib is that when given facts, and they have nothing else to go by, they will retaliate with character assassinations. They would rather demean the credentials of the individual with fallacies in hopes of avoiding giving answers. By the way, Billy…yes, Jesus rode a Donkey but NO, he was not a LIBERAL. Remember, Jesus feeding 5,000 was not a charity but was a Miracle.

Last, I wonder how anyone would want to be dependent upon somebody else. I believe we have to be individuals and I do not believe we need big Government control. Liberals however rely upon leeches sucking the Government for all they can get, because these are the ones who cast their vote for the Democrat/Liberal Party. Remember, Jesus made men into fishermen, not Welfare Recipients.

If you have a problem with Liberals like I do, here is your chance to vent.

Democrat Plan like Kerry's Plan...Unknown to everyone.

2006-08-12T16:24:00.000-07:00

On Friday, Democratic leaders accused Vice President Dick Cheney of playing politics with terrorism. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, said “The American people simply do not recognize any validity in what they’re saying”.

It seems the Democrat Party is accusing the Republican Party of politicizing while they are the ones politicizing the issue at hand. In fact, turning the television on this weekend I have found very little praise to the Bush Administration for the terrorist plot revealed.

However, if the plot would have been successful we would have had the Democrats voicing how the Bush administration is failing (even more than they already do), yet when the administration is successful the events are overlooked by the Liberal Media and Democrats. Think back to the capture of Saddam Hussein, Republicans were filled with joy and Democrats filled with disappointment as the capture was a major advancement for the Bush Administration.

Next, think about Zarhqawi’s death and the Liberals voicing their concern that 5 innocent women and children were killed in the bombing that rid this World of a dangerous man. Unfortunately the likes of Cindy Sheehan and John “Jack” Murtha are what dominate the Liberal news along with criticizing the Republican Party.

Once again, I am waiting to hear the Democrat Party’s plan for the War on Terrorism, the War in Iraq…I am tired of hearing sound bytes about the Bush administration…maybe someone can leave an insightful look at the Party’s plan of action.

Patience is a virtue.

2006-08-10T21:16:00.000-07:00

In London, British police thwarted a terrorist plot to blow up U.S.-bound jetliners over the Atlantic and kill thousands. According to Yahoo! News, the plan would have been on the same or even bigger scale of 9/11, which would have involved liquid explosives concealed as sports drink bottles and common electronic devices to bring down as many as ten planes in a simultaneous air strike.

The bombs would have been assembled on the aircrafts using a peroxide-based solution detonated by such devices as disposable cameras or music players. Thus far, twenty-four people have been arrested and five more people are being sought after. The suspects were believed to be primarily British Muslims, some of Pakistani descent.

Here is the real puzzling piece of this story. Passengers who are being delayed because of this are irritated that they have more and more security checkpoints to go through. One gentleman was quoted as saying, "My family and I have been going on vacation for 3 years now and right now, I'd rather be at home...” Then there is a woman from Michigan flying to London who said, "They (Airport Security) confiscated my iPOD music player and now I have an eight hour delay with no iPOD."

What is up with these people? I know if I was boarding a flight following these events, I would want to make sure that the flight was safe and good to go. How can these people have such selfish attitudes when it comes to their safety as well as others? It's amazing to me that the media always seem to find the most idiotic, uneducated individuals in the crowd and interview them. Have Americans forgotten what happened almost five years ago? Terrorism has become a way of life for us and the rest of the World, it's time to accept and realize this.

95% Democrat + 5% Other= 100% hated by Liberals

2006-08-09T19:47:00.000-07:00

Unless you've been under a rock all day and now all night long, you've heard the latest news engulfing the Democrat Party. Top Democrats on Capitol Hill abandoned Senator Joe Lieberman one at a time on Wednesday by giving their support to Ned Lamont, an anti-war challenger, who defeated Lieberman in the primary.

John Kerry, Hillary Rotten-Clinton, Edward Kennedy, Al Gore, Harry Reid, Frank Lautenberg, they all turned on Lieberman to give Lamont their support. The majority of those named above had already commented that they would back the winner of the primary and Clinton was hinting that Lieberman should quit the race all together and needed to "search his conscience and decide what is best for Connecticut and for the Democratic Party".

With the actions of the Democratic Party, this will bring forth an interesting 90 days when Elections are held. Lieberman has already appealed and started the process to be on the November ballot, but as an Independent. I believe whole-heartedly, come November he is going to capture more votes not only from Democrats but from Republicans as well.

My question is- how much of an impact will Lieberman's loss in the Primary influence the voting results in November when he runs as an Independent? How will this affect the Democrat Party and is this possible weaknesses being exposed before the 2008 Presidential Campaign?

And the answer IS...??

2006-08-08T14:58:00.000-07:00

I've read blogs, newspaper articles, listened to the Radio, heard talk by the water cooler about Republican's and their damn piss-poor job they are doing in the War in Iraq, Education, Homeland Security, etc. and I have one question...

Can someone please tell me what the Democratic plan is for the War in Iraq, or Education or even Homeland Security?

All I hear is a bunch of moaning and groaning about the Republicans, but someone...Democrat...Liberal...I don't care...but someone step up to the plate and clarify what it is that the Democrats are going to do instead of complaining about the Republicans. You know, it's always easier to degrade someone else's plan, especially when you do not share YOUR plan.