Saturday, August 12, 2006

Democrat Plan like Kerry's Plan...Unknown to everyone.

On Friday, Democratic leaders accused Vice President Dick Cheney of playing politics with terrorism. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, said “The American people simply do not recognize any validity in what they’re saying”.

It seems the Democrat Party is accusing the Republican Party of politicizing while they are the ones politicizing the issue at hand. In fact, turning the television on this weekend I have found very little praise to the Bush Administration for the terrorist plot revealed.

However, if the plot would have been successful we would have had the Democrats voicing how the Bush administration is failing (even more than they already do), yet when the administration is successful the events are overlooked by the Liberal Media and Democrats. Think back to the capture of Saddam Hussein, Republicans were filled with joy and Democrats filled with disappointment as the capture was a major advancement for the Bush Administration.

Next, think about Zarhqawi’s death and the Liberals voicing their concern that 5 innocent women and children were killed in the bombing that rid this World of a dangerous man. Unfortunately the likes of Cindy Sheehan and John “Jack” Murtha are what dominate the Liberal news along with criticizing the Republican Party.

Once again, I am waiting to hear the Democrat Party’s plan for the War on Terrorism, the War in Iraq…I am tired of hearing sound bytes about the Bush administration…maybe someone can leave an insightful look at the Party’s plan of action.

Thursday, August 10, 2006

Patience is a virtue.

In London, British police thwarted a terrorist plot to blow up U.S.-bound jetliners over the Atlantic and kill thousands. According to Yahoo! News, the plan would have been on the same or even bigger scale of 9/11, which would have involved liquid explosives concealed as sports drink bottles and common electronic devices to bring down as many as ten planes in a simultaneous air strike.

The bombs would have been assembled on the aircrafts using a peroxide-based solution detonated by such devices as disposable cameras or music players. Thus far, twenty-four people have been arrested and five more people are being sought after. The suspects were believed to be primarily British Muslims, some of Pakistani descent.

Here is the real puzzling piece of this story. Passengers who are being delayed because of this are irritated that they have more and more security checkpoints to go through. One gentleman was quoted as saying, "My family and I have been going on vacation for 3 years now and right now, I'd rather be at home...” Then there is a woman from Michigan flying to London who said, "They (Airport Security) confiscated my iPOD music player and now I have an eight hour delay with no iPOD."

What is up with these people? I know if I was boarding a flight following these events, I would want to make sure that the flight was safe and good to go. How can these people have such selfish attitudes when it comes to their safety as well as others? It's amazing to me that the media always seem to find the most idiotic, uneducated individuals in the crowd and interview them. Have Americans forgotten what happened almost five years ago? Terrorism has become a way of life for us and the rest of the World, it's time to accept and realize this.

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

95% Democrat + 5% Other= 100% hated by Liberals

Unless you've been under a rock all day and now all night long, you've heard the latest news engulfing the Democrat Party. Top Democrats on Capitol Hill abandoned Senator Joe Lieberman one at a time on Wednesday by giving their support to Ned Lamont, an anti-war challenger, who defeated Lieberman in the primary.

John Kerry, Hillary Rotten-Clinton, Edward Kennedy, Al Gore, Harry Reid, Frank Lautenberg, they all turned on Lieberman to give Lamont their support. The majority of those named above had already commented that they would back the winner of the primary and Clinton was hinting that Lieberman should quit the race all together and needed to "search his conscience and decide what is best for Connecticut and for the Democratic Party".

With the actions of the Democratic Party, this will bring forth an interesting 90 days when Elections are held. Lieberman has already appealed and started the process to be on the November ballot, but as an Independent. I believe whole-heartedly, come November he is going to capture more votes not only from Democrats but from Republicans as well.

My question is- how much of an impact will Lieberman's loss in the Primary influence the voting results in November when he runs as an Independent? How will this affect the Democrat Party and is this possible weaknesses being exposed before the 2008 Presidential Campaign?

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

And the answer IS...??

I've read blogs, newspaper articles, listened to the Radio, heard talk by the water cooler about Republican's and their damn piss-poor job they are doing in the War in Iraq, Education, Homeland Security, etc. and I have one question...

Can someone please tell me what the Democratic plan is for the War in Iraq, or Education or even Homeland Security?

All I hear is a bunch of moaning and groaning about the Republicans, but someone...Democrat...Liberal...I don't care...but someone step up to the plate and clarify what it is that the Democrats are going to do instead of complaining about the Republicans. You know, it's always easier to degrade someone else's plan, especially when you do not share YOUR plan.

Sunday, August 06, 2006

Let the conspiracy begin...

This coming September 11th will mark the five year anniversary since the U.S. experienced a devastating attack by Terrorist killing more than 3,000 people. This movement led to the formation of the group, Scholars for 9/11 Truth.

One of the members, Kevin Barrett, believes the U.S. government might have played a part in destroying the World Trade Center. In the fall, Barrett will be teaching a class on Islam at the University of Wisconsin which has drawn protests by more than 60 state legislators.

According to the article, found on Yahoo! News, the organization has boosted membership to around 75 academic members since the publicity of Barrett's thoughts and feelings.

"Most aren't experts in relevant fields. But some are well educated, with degrees from elite universities such as Princeton and Stanford and jobs at schools including Rice, Indiana and the University of Texas".

The "scholars" reject the idea that "hijackers crashed planes into the twin towers" and believe that explosives were placed inside the building and were detonated, which led to the collapse of both towers. Another member, Judy Wood, commented that the U.S. Government would not have told the public an incorrect story unless they had taken part on that grief-stricken day.

I have a hard time believing this conspiracy that the Government was involved on 9/11. I never thought at any point in time that someone or a group of people would actually try to blame the Government for the destruction. In fact, the group does not believe they are extremist at all. They just want to get their point of view across to help the American society see the "truth".

To me, these people are extremists and I will continue to stand behind the original thought process of what truly happened on 9/11. Here's a thought for the extremist though, what if the explosives (assuming there was explosives) were installed by members of the Terrorist group?

Of course though, conspiracies will always be there because this society we live in is full of weird, demented people who find all kinds of ways to blame this on others. Liberals want to blame it on the Americans and give too much credit to these terrorist groups. Just like they want diplomacy with a group of people whose main goal is to kill Americans. You cannot have diplomacy in situations like this.