Saturday, September 23, 2006

William, your word is Accountability...

This story just came in from Reuters with Bill Clinton defending his administrations efforts in the pursuit of Osama bin Laden, while accusing the Bush administration of doing far less to capture bin Laden before the devastating attacks of 9/11.

Clinton blames Bush for bin Laden

You can read the article from the link listed above but in case you are too lazy to check it out, Clinton was quoted as saying,

“But at least I tried. That’s the difference in me and some, including all of the right-wingers who are attacking me now…They had eight months to try, they did not try. I tried. So I tried and failed.”

Clinton later on mentions the attack in October of 2000 of the USS Cole and said that if anyone wants to criticize him, they “can criticize me for this: after the Cole, I had battle plans drawn to go into Afghanistan, overthrow the Taliban and launch a full-scale attack search for bin Laden…”

Here is a prime example of Liberals trying to re-write history books with Clinton placing blame on the current administration. He stated that the Bush administration had eight months to do something and did not, but what about the Clinton administration?

Attacks before the USS Cole by al-Qaeda occurred in 1993, 1996, and 1998. What did the Clinton administration do then? If history and memory serves us right, he did not do much of anything. In fact he did not consider al-Qaeda a true threat to the United States and passed on the opportunity for the U.S. to obtain Osama bin Laden from Sudan. However, once again he failed because he was worried about socialistic issues and was not concerned with National Defense.

This interview comes just weeks after the docudrama ‘Path to 9/11’, which was seen as ‘indisputably wrong’ by Clinton. It amazes me how liberals want to have this perception about them as being perfect and when facts (not feelings or beliefs) are brought forward, they try to dispute the notion they are far from perfect. 'Path to 9/11' aside, why does he not mention the attacks listed above? Could it be that he realizes he truly failed and would not want to admit it for fear of what it would do to his reputation?

Maybe one day we, as Americans, will have the pleasures of hearing William Jefferson Clinton admit, let me say that again, admit, to not doing an adequate job in the pursuit of Osama bin Laden and yes his administration could have helped the Bush administration stop one of the most tragic days this country has seen in its history on U.S. soil.

**There are unconfirmed reports that Osama bin Laden died in August of 2006 of Typhoid. This story is developing and can be read about at Drudge **

Friday, September 22, 2006

This is for the Liberal AaronBarlow...

So, ole aaronbarlow tried to attack myself and Crankyright and he has enabled comment moderation...if he doesn't like the comment, it will not get posted. Here is the piece of shit he wrote and below this link is my response. It is long and I do apologize...

Wah, Wah, Republicans are better, Wah, Wah

“Over the past forty years, the right has worked hard at developing strategies that would allow them to control public discussion in America. Long before Democrats figured out what was happening, the right had learned to frame the debate by controlling the terminology…almost completely because of the skills of the rightwing strategists.”

So basically you are calling the Democrats over the past 40 years dumb! These “skills” you talk about of the ‘rightwing strategists’- would that not be classified as intelligence?

“Today, they have to defend an administration whose policies have failed and continue to fail, and whose minions are showing up as corrupt on an almost weekly basis”

Let me ask you about the Clinton Administration- do you not consider lying under oath as a corrupt administration? I mean, let us look at his administration

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

“Second, people on the left have learned by example, and are now framing the national debates as skillfully as the right once did…”

Left learning by example implies you mean from the Right. So are you saying the left is too dumb that they must rely upon the Right for guidance and leadership skills?

“In the 1970s, the right saw a divide within the left that it could use for a number of purposes…”

What about this year, just recently, when the Left was divided yet again? You remember Joe Lieberman versus the Democratic Party? Or even Hitlery Rotten Clinton versus John “I have a plan” Kerry? I know, I know…what about John McCain, Warner or Lindsey? Can you say RINO? For those democrats that Aaron called dumb in the beginning, this stands for Republican in Name Only.

“Liberals believe in debate and in respect for opponents”

Respect for opponents? What’s your excuse for Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean, John Kerry, or even John Murtha- who seemingly have no respect for their opponents. Seems like all they care about is “scoring points and making their opponents look bad to whomever might be watching”, wait that’s your line…my bad.

“I didn’t have to look far before seeing a typical rightwing straw man…frame the debate in such a way as only the right can win…”

Please elaborate on how I ‘framed the debate in a way as only the right can win’? Examples were given to you by me and other Conservative-Majority readers, yet you chose to dismiss them. How can you honestly dismiss the ACLU? However you did.

I need your definition of what torture is/or should be. Essentially, no matter how you look at it, ceasing torture is being nicer to terrorists. The ACLU website (which you refused to accept) had an organizational member mention being nice because they (terrorists) are human, too. You can do the research, please realize that I cannot do both yours and my side in this. However, if you truly need leadership with this, I suppose you can rely upon me for guidance.

“Thing about us liberals is that we tend to want to keep on talking, hoping that the other side will eventually listen to reason”

Let’s be honest again, it has nothing to do with the other side listening to reason. It goes back to “if you say it enough, people will eventually believe it.” No wonder why we hear so much from Pelosi and Kerry.

“Yes, it does take a lot to make a liberal angry—it took an attack on Pearl Harbor for the liberal Roosevelt administration to go to war—but we can only be pushed so far.”

Too bad the 1993 WTC bombing (by al-Qaeda), 1996 Khobar Towers attacked (by al-Qaeda), 1998 U.S. embassies bombed (by al-Qaeda), 2000 USS Cole attacked (by al-Qaeda), did not push the Liberals far enough to be angry.

You say that you’re not going “to bother” to tell us during debates, but my question is this. Is it truly because you’re not going to bother or is it because if the right has to ask, then how in the hell would you know?

You write about mischaracterization, but come on professor, even Gilligan knows Liberals are more infamous for their character assassinations of the Right. “Appealing to history…Stick to what is going on now…”? On yeah, this is the Liberal excuse so no blame can be put on the Clinton years. *Please refer to the al-Qaeda attacks listed above.

Yes, the U.S. was the result of Liberal philosophies but professor you’re smart enough to realize the Liberals of today are different from yesteryear. Damn it, that’s right you want to forget history and go with what is happening now.

“We created the greatest country this world has ever seen and fought—and defeated—the greatest evils brought upon it…”

The greatest evils brought upon it…really inspiring words you’ve written. So, what is the Left’s plan to fight terrorism? Or to capture real evil that attacked the greatest country this world has ever seen under the watch of Bill Clinton?

AaronBarlow and Liberal friends- I urge you to respond and keep in mind Conservative-Majority will not disallow your comments. **Team members are standing by via e-mail if you need help with your debate at**

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Stand by YOUR Man...

Conservative-Majority would love to give a heartfelt ‘Amen’ to Representative Charles Rangel. In case you missed it, here is his quote

“An attack on Bush is an attack on all Americans… ‘You do not come into my country, my congressional district, and you do not condemn my President. If there is any criticism of President Bush, it should be restricted to Americans, whether they voted for him or not. I just want to make it abundantly clear to Hugo Chavez or any other president, do not come to the United States and think because we have problems with our president that any foreigner can come to our country and not think that Americans do not feel offended when you offend our Chief of State’…”

Conservative-Majority would also love to give a heartfelt ‘Are you feeling okay’ to Nancy Pelosi. In case you’ve been hiding under a rock lately, Pelosi, one of President Bush's fiercest political opponents at home, took his side on Thursday

"Hugo Chavez fancies himself a modern day Simon Bolivar but all he is an everyday thug,"… “Hugo Chavez abused the privilege that he had, speaking at the United Nations…”

Talk about questioning whether hell is freezing over as I type this, here is two Democrats, one from New York (Rangel) and the other is from California (Pelosi) actually defending our President. You know the very same President the Democratic Party keeps telling us, “Bush lied, People died”.

The way I look at it is this, Chavez’s comments are going to make a lot of Americans angry and it just so happens that Pelosi is trying to become the next Speaker of the House. If I was a gambling man I would put my money that Pelosi is using this to gain more votes in her November Election bid than to actually defend our President. Keep in mind Conservative-Majority readers, Democrats in the past three years have not been too far off of Chavez for what they have said about OUR Commander-in-Chief.

One of the many reasons as to Why I believe in Jesus Christ...

"I remember them coming and kneeling by me," Viola said of the paramedics who came to her home. "I don't remember them carrying me out."

Her next memory is being bathed in a blue light and watching herself on an emergency room treatment table.

"I was a little bitty person, about this big," she said, holding her thumb and forefinger about an inch apart.

"I looked down, and when I looked down I saw myself, and I was blue, too," she said. "I remember floating in a blue cloud.

"I was watching myself and floating in this cloud, and somebody asked me do I need help? I said yes. I don't know where they took me or what they did."

For the entire story Click Here

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Club Gitmo (Liberal Style)...

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

For the Bush haters...

I am tired of the President Bush haters saying that “Bush lied”, “Bush lied”, “Bush lied” and if they are going to claim this then it is time for them to read what other Democrats said about WMD in Iraq since1998. Maybe the anti-Bush groups will realize the truth when they hear their own speaking out.

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline Albright, 1998

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983" -- National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security." -- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

Monday, September 18, 2006

Liberal Media overlooks wrongdoing of Hollywood Left...

The Hollywood Left has struck again and yet again their outlandish viewpoints have been completely ignored by the Liberal Media. Rosie O’Donnell claimed last week on “The View” that radical Christianity is “…just as threatening as radical Islam…” and says “…U.S. is bombing innocent people…”

Can you imagine if a Republican would make a comment paralleling the magnitude of O’Donnell? The individual or group would be chastised by the media and their characters publicly assassinated.

It amazes me how America has become so divided and I personally cannot remember so much hatred shown towards a President of the United States, especially by the Hollywood Left. It seems to me that they (Hollywood Left) look with admiration of Bill Clinton granting him a hero-like pedestal and have placed no blame on his lack of actions pertaining to the al-Qaeda attacks in the 1990’s.

Seemingly every statement from these Liberals correlates back to the messages of “Bush lied”, “impeach Bush”, or “blame the Bush administration”. Amazingly enough the word accountability appears to be non-existent in the vocabulary of these people when the point is brought up indicating that the Clinton administration could have done more than they did. On another blog I was recently told that, “we must not live in the past and must place blame on the current administration for America’s problems.” If in 2008 a Democratic Party member holds the office of our Commander-in-Chief, is it feasible to blame America’s problems on the current administration or will there be continuous blame placed on the Bush administration? Obviously this is a rhetorical question that I already know the answer to.

Last is the “scholar” from the New York City College of Technology who tried to rebuttal the statement I had previously made in another Conservative-Majority post in regards to Club Gitmo (Guantanamo Bay). Thus proving the known issue of our society problems with Liberal professors, their ideology and what is being taught to our youth. I paid my dues in college with Liberal professors and having to deal with their un-American ideas being strung throughout the class curriculum and I know this is only going to get worse.